Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-03
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
This chart provides the information about what anthropology graduates from a university done after completing their undergraduate degree skill, in addition the table also illustrates the income of the anthropologist consumed in occupation later five years.
In the beginning, the different types of students education from a university had after accomplishing their degree course in job after last five years like that full time, part time work, and unemployed, no know.
In the starting, people fully concentrated of work around a maximum level 52% but, the students focused on part time work averaged 8%. As well as the consumption of workers and postgrad study totally declined from a university.
The amount of unemployed belonged anthropology education from a university was a minimum 8%.
In addition, the three types of employments utilised their incomes after five years such as freelance consultants, Government sector and, Private companies, those sectors would role different in after five years 5 to 40%, 5 to 50% and 10 t0 30%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
The response attempts to address the prompt by mentioning both the chart and the table, but the selection of data is erratic and incomplete. While some major features are touched upon, such as the 52% for full-time work and parts of the salary data for freelance consultants and government sectors, the information is presented in a very confused manner. Several key figures are either misread or unclearly expressed, and there is no coherent overview provided of the overall trends shown in the visual data. The ideas are limited and under-developed, meaning the response only partially covers the requirements of the task.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The organization of the response is weak, and there is a noticeable lack of clear overall progression. Although the text is broken into multiple paragraphs, the logical links between sentences are frequently faulty or mechanical. Referencing is often unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow which data points correspond to which categories. Cohesive devices are used inadequately or inappropriately, creating disjointed transitions between the information from the chart and the table. Overall, the structural flow lacks the necessary control to guide the reader smoothly through the data.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
The vocabulary used is limited and basic, with frequent lexical errors that strain the reader's understanding. There are notable issues with word choice, word form, and collocation, such as using 'done' instead of 'went', or writing 'unemployed, no know' instead of 'not known'. The student attempts to use some task-specific terminology like 'anthropology graduates' and 'freelance consultants', but inaccurate phrasing and awkward expressions prevent precise communication of the visual data. Spelling and word choice errors occur consistently throughout the response.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The response exhibits a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying primarily on simple sentences with frequent attempts at complex forms that are heavily flawed. There are frequent errors in verb forms, tenses, prepositions, and article usage, such as 'what anthropology graduates from a university done' and 'the income of the anthropologist consumed in occupation later five years'. These persistent grammatical mistakes disrupt the flow of the writing and can occasionally distort the intended meaning, reflecting basic control over sentence construction.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
