Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The pie chart illustrates the destination of Anthropology graduates from one university. The table depicts the salaries of Anthropolgy graduates after 5 years work.

Overall, it is evident that the full-time work accounted for the highest proportion of the chart, while part-time work with postgraduation study recorded the lowest percentage. Moreover, the table represents that in government sector half of employees were getting heigher salaries, whereas only a few workers got minimium pay from both freelance consultants and government sector.

The pie chart showed that the majority of graduates were interested in doing full-time work at 52%. In contrast, only 5% Anthropologists were doing part-time job and postgraduating study. The percentage for part-time work stood at 15%, and about 12% graduates were unemployed. However, the figure for full-time postgraduating students and unknown graduates was 8% for each respectively.

Regarding to the table, although it showed that 5% of employeers were getting [redacted phone]9 dollars from freelance cosultants and government sector, 10% workers got [redacted phone]9 dollars pay from private companies. Government sector was paying [redacted phone] plus dollars to 52% of workers, while 30% of employeers were getting that pay from private companies. It is noted that freelance consultants, government sector and private companies gave [redacted phone]9 dollars to 15%, 15% and 35% anthropologists respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by summarizing the main features of both the pie chart and the table, and includes appropriate comparisons between categories. An overview is provided right at the beginning, noting key extremes such as the highest and lowest proportions in the chart. However, certain parts of the response are more fully developed than others; for instance, the analysis of the table contains minor inaccuracies in reading the data, such as stating that 52% of workers in the government sector received over 100,000 dollars, whereas the actual figure is 50%. This minor flaw keeps the task response from reaching a higher level, while still demonstrating a clear grasp of the overall visual information.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear logical progression from the introductory summary to the body paragraphs detailing the pie chart and the table respectively. Paragraphing is used sufficiently to separate distinct visual sources. Cohesive devices are employed to link ideas, such as 'Overall', 'In contrast', and 'However', although some referencing is slightly mechanical or repetitive in structure. Pronoun use and referencing are generally clear, enabling the reader to follow the flow of information smoothly, but greater flexibility in transitions would elevate the organizational quality further.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'proportion', 'consultants', and 'unemployed'. However, there are several spelling and word-choice errors that slightly impede precision, including 'Anthropolgy' instead of Anthropology, 'heigher' instead of higher, 'minimium' instead of minimum, 'employeers' instead of employees or employers, and 'cosultants' instead of consultants. Despite these slips, the vocabulary remains functional and sufficient to communicate the main data points effectively, fitting the profile of this level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing structures like relative clauses and comparative constructions. There are some errors in grammar and punctuation, such as missing articles ('in government sector' instead of 'in the government sector'), awkward prepositional phrasing ('Regarding to the table' instead of 'Regarding the table' or 'With regard to the table'), and tense inconsistencies. Nevertheless, these errors rarely impede communication, and the majority of sentences are understandable, maintaining a satisfactory level of grammatical control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.