Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The pie chart depicts the proportion of graduates did after finishing their undergraduate degree course from one university and the table illutrates the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.

Overall, full-time working graduates had the highest share compared to other categories. Part-time work along with postgraduation study recorded the least number of graduates whereas Full-time postgraduation study and graduates with no data share an equal proportion.

Anthropology graduates doing a full-time work accounted the largest proportion at 8% whereas graduates doing part-time work along with postgraduation was at 5% which was less as compared to other proportions. Part-time working graduates were 15% and unemployed were 12% respectively. The data shows that graduates studying full-time postgraduation and the data which is not known share equal proportion at 12% respectively.

The salaries of Anthropology graduates varies according to diferent type of employment such as for freelance consultants and government sector 5% of employees earn $25,000-$49,999 after 5 year's of work and 40% and 50% with $ 100,000+ salary. Private companies pay higher compared to other employment with 10% in the inital, 25% for $75,000- $99,999 and 30% for $100,000+ salaries.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You include both the destination chart and the salary table, and your overview identifies full-time work as the largest destination and combined part-time work and postgraduate study as the smallest. However, a major figure is misreported: full-time work was 52%, not 8%. You also say full-time postgraduate study and the unknown category are both 12%, although each was 8%. These errors undermine the main comparisons. The salary section gives some accurate figures, including the lowest salary shares for freelance consultants and government employees, but it omits the $50,000–$74,999 figures and does not clearly compare the three employment types. Select the key data accurately and summarise the salary pattern more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on graduate destinations and a final paragraph on salaries. This helps the reader identify the two visuals. However, progression within paragraphs is uneven, and some links between ideas are unclear. For example, the sentence beginning “The data shows that graduates studying full-time postgraduation” is difficult to follow because it repeats the earlier comparison without clearly distinguishing the two categories. The salary paragraph also moves from low-income figures to the highest band and then to private companies without a consistent comparison pattern. Organise each paragraph around a clear sequence, such as largest-to-smallest destinations and then salary bands across employment types.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “proportion,” “accounted,” “graduates,” and “employment,” and the meaning is generally understandable. There is some variety in how you refer to the categories, but several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “the proportion of graduates did,” “the least number of graduates,” and “with $100,000+ salary.” Spelling errors such as “illutrates,” “diferent,” and “inital” also reduce accuracy. Use standard chart language consistently—for example, “the proportion of graduates who…” and “the smallest share”—and check spelling and natural combinations of words. More precise vocabulary would make the comparisons clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, and the overall meaning can usually be understood. However, errors occur frequently in sentence structure and grammatical forms. The opening phrase “the proportion of graduates did” is missing a relative construction, while “full-time working graduates had the highest share” lacks a clear grammatical link to the chart data. There are also agreement and article problems in “The salaries … varies” and “a full-time work,” and the sentence about the two 12% categories is awkwardly constructed. These issues sometimes make relationships between figures unclear. Practise building accurate comparison sentences, checking subject–verb agreement, articles and plural forms, and use shorter sentences when a longer structure becomes difficult to control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.