Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-26
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of graduatesin the subject of anthrapology after completing their bachelor degree while the table compare their salaries taking in different department.
Overall, the participation of full time jobs are the highest while the contribution of part time + post graduates study are the lowest . In the the table the freelancer represent the highest proportion while praivate companies represent the lowest percentage.
In the pie chart the the participation of the full-time jobs is more than half of the whole which was 52% while part time worker represent 15%. Inaddition, Unemployed and full-time post grade study contributed for 12% and 8% repectively.
In contrast ,table provide information about the salaries of antrhopology graduates after doing their 5years jobs .Furthermore, The percentage of workers is higher who,s wkorks in government sector which is 50% .
Freelancer consultant represent 40% while praivate companies contributes for 30%.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You identify the main destination, full-time work at 52%, and note that unemployment and full-time postgraduate study account for 12% and 8%. You also make a broad comparison between the employment sectors. However, the report covers the chart only partially: it omits the 5% combining part-time work with postgraduate study, the 8% whose destination is unknown, and the 15% in part-time work is mentioned without being set against the other categories. The table discussion is especially limited: the 50% figure for government employment is a salary-band share, not the proportion of workers in that sector, and the 40% and 30% figures are not clearly tied to salary bands. Include the key salary distributions and clarify what each percentage represents to make the summary more complete and accurate.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a basic overall structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details about the chart and then the table. This gives the reader some sense of organisation. However, progression is limited because the chart details are incomplete and the table section contains only a few isolated figures. Linking phrases such as “In contrast” and “Furthermore” are used, but they do not always express a clear relationship between the information; “In contrast” does not introduce a meaningful contrast here. Repetition of “the participation” and “represent” also makes the report feel repetitive. Group the chart figures together, then describe the salary bands by sector, using clear comparisons and references so each figure’s meaning is easy to follow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some task-related vocabulary, including “proportion,” “graduates,” “salary,” and “government sector,” and the reader can generally identify the topic. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning unclear. For example, “participation of full time jobs” is not a natural way to describe graduate destinations, and “the freelancer represent the highest proportion” does not accurately describe the table’s salary figures. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “anthrapology,” “praivate,” and “repectively.” Aim for precise terms such as “share of graduates,” “salary band,” and “freelance consultants,” and check spelling carefully.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, grammatical errors occur frequently and sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to understand. Examples include “the table compare” instead of “the table compares,” “the participation … are the highest” instead of “is highest,” and “workers is higher who’s works” instead of a correctly formed clause such as “the proportion of workers in the government sector earning … is higher.” Articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “In the the table” and the comma splice-like construction in the opening. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and use shorter, controlled sentences before adding complex clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
