Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 15 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The pie chart illustrates regarding students from one particular university do after completing their graduation in anthropology and in terms of salaries in three different employment sectors after 5 years work.

Overall, the major porportion of graduates get full time job while part time plus postgrad study have least number of students. In terms of renumeration, government sector provides high salaries after getting five year experience.

To begin with, 52% of total passed out students get into full time work. The second major portion of students get part-time work accumulated to 15%. The percentage for full time postgrad study and for student who not known as what they do after completing their studies are 8%. There are unemployed students too who cant get any kind of work accounted to 12%. The least percentage is 5% for student do part time work plus postgrad study.

After getting experience of 5 years work. The salaries that anthropology students gets $25000-$75000 bracket are freelance consultant and government sector respectively, while freelancers get 40% $75000-$[redacted phone] and plus. Whereas, goverment employees get 50% $[redacted phone] and more. The proportion of private companies provides 10% $25000-$75000 and $[redacted phone] and plus to 30%

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main destination pattern accurately: full-time work is the largest category at 52%, while combining part-time work with postgraduate study is the smallest at 5%. You also include the key salary groups and note that government employees are most likely to earn $100,000 or more. However, the salary comparison is less fully reported and contains a significant misreading: freelance consultants and government employees each have 5% in the $25,000–49,999 band, not in a combined $25,000–75,000 bracket. The private-company figures are also unclear; the table shows 10%, 35%, 25% and 30% across the four bands. A clearer overview and more precise comparisons would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on graduate destinations and a final paragraph on salaries. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and phrases such as “To begin with” and “Whereas” help signal movement between points. This organisation meets the task’s needs, but the salary paragraph’s comparisons are difficult to track because several figures and income bands are compressed into long, unclear statements. For example, “The salaries that anthropology students gets $25000-$75000 bracket…” does not clearly show which percentages belong to which bands. Use one sentence per employment sector or group related bands together, and make comparisons explicit to improve progression and cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a suitable range of task-related vocabulary, including “full time work,” “postgrad study,” “unemployed,” “salaries” and “employment sectors.” Terms such as “major portion” and “renumeration” show an attempt to vary your wording, although some choices are inaccurate or unnatural. There are also spelling errors, including “porportion” and “goverment,” and phrases such as “passed out students” and “get into full time work” are not natural in this context. These do not prevent the reader from understanding the main message, but they reduce precision. Aim for standard chart-reporting collocations and use the same clear terms for categories and salary bands throughout.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, some errors in sentence structure, agreement and verb forms make parts of the report unclear. For example, “The pie chart illustrates regarding students … do” has an incomplete construction; “the salaries that anthropology students gets” has subject–verb disagreement; and “The proportion of private companies provides” uses an unsuitable sentence structure. Articles and plural forms also need attention, as in “for student who not known.” Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement and tense. More accurate control of these patterns would make your comparisons easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.