Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Majority of village residents are shifting to cities from their natives.The population in the regionside is declining due to less humans are staying in that place.In my pont of view this is the positive impact for all people.They can develop good life with their family members.
One of the beneficial thing is citizens from rural side could not sustain with their career growth because, most of the people are develop their work and knowledge in city side.Morever, government has been supporting people mostly in urban areas compared with rural areas.Therefore, education system and job opportunities are enhancing massively in city places.However, in the village area does not provide good qualities of education.Additionally, job vacancies are not available there due to, government has not spend more money in village places.This significant statment is the biggest reason for residents to move from rural to urban.
On the one hand merit is cities have numerous facilities from authority's side such as, purify waters, transportations, safety polices and securities at any times.These optimistics have been presenting since before technology developed.Whereas, in village area does not have featured owing to, most of the houses are too long distances.For instance, in rural area if, a person wants to communicate he should walks without a cycle, or a motorbike due to, in village does not has proper roads and highways instead this people have a strong interest to move their life from village to city.
In, conclusion overall public want to develop their areas but the government, or special member of legislatives are not visiting rural areas this cause extremely danger to stay in rural.Therefore, majority of population have keen on live in cities.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear: you consider rural-to-urban migration positive, and you give relevant reasons, including better education and employment prospects, public services, transport and safety. The examples about limited rural job opportunities and difficulty travelling on poor roads help explain why people move. This addresses the main question, but some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the claim that city life lets people “develop good life with their family members” is not supported with a specific outcome, and the conclusion shifts towards criticising government attention to rural areas without clearly weighing this against the benefits you have described. Develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or example, and keep the positive evaluation consistent throughout.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The paragraphs generally group related ideas, and linking expressions such as “For instance,” “Whereas” and “In conclusion” show an attempt to guide the reader. However, progression is not always smooth. The second body paragraph begins “On the one hand” without a corresponding “on the other hand,” although the essay argues mainly one side. Several transitions, including “Therefore” and “Additionally,” connect ideas mechanically, and some sentences contain multiple points that are difficult to follow. The conclusion also introduces government neglect rather than clearly summarising the reasons already discussed. Use clearer topic sentences and make each paragraph develop one central point in a logical sequence.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “job opportunities,” “education system,” “transportations” and “rural to urban,” so the reader can identify the subject and your main ideas. There are also attempts at less common wording, such as “career growth” and “legislatives,” but inaccurate word choice and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make meaning unclear. Examples include “regionside,” “optimistics,” “purify waters” and “special member of legislatives.” Spelling errors such as “pont,” “Morever” and “statment” further reduce precision. Aim for common, accurate expressions before trying more elaborate vocabulary, and check whether nouns and verbs naturally combine in English. This would make your ideas easier to understand without changing their substance.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with reasons and contrasts, for example the sentence beginning “For instance, in rural area…” and the contrast introduced by “Whereas.” However, control of these structures is limited, and errors in sentence formation, agreement, articles and verb forms often make the reader work to understand the meaning. Examples include “due to less humans are staying,” “in the village area does not provide,” “he should walks,” and “in village does not has.” Punctuation also creates run-on sentences, particularly where several clauses are joined with commas. Practise building accurate basic sentences first, then add one subordinate clause at a time; check subject–verb agreement and the verb form after modal verbs such as “should.”
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.