Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In search of batter life and more golden oppertunities, most of the people are moving from rural areas to urban society now a days almost in every contry. It has a positive impact on living condition of migrators but in my openion overall it is a negative development and has a bad impact throughout the society.

Mostly in third world countries, a large number of individuals can migrate in order to make their lives esier and to get better facilities. The main focus of them is on a good job . In cities those people can get better medication, better treatment, good quality of education and golden oppertuniety of jobs. For example, a family moves from rural area to a well civilized city, parents can get aa good job and they will be able to give their children a good quality of education. After some time their children can get a good job and they will settle at that place after some time.

Besides this settlement, they can face a lot of problems in adjusting. Obiviously they can consume resources which can ultimately increase burden on city managment authorithies. So that's why this migration has overall a negative impact on society. To get rid of this, in my openion, governments should spent some budgets in order to make conditions of villages. Authorities should have to provide facalities to villagers so that the process of migration can be stopped.

In fact, rural areas need advancement and familiarity with new devices, since it is the age of modernization. Hospitals, schools and colleges are the basic need of today's youngsters. Governments should have to pay attention on the basic needs of rural as well as urban individuals to stop the chain reaction of migration.

In conclusions, to keep a balance on utalization of ressources, governments must have to divide them in a better way.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: although migration can improve migrants’ access to jobs, healthcare and education, you judge the overall effect to be negative. This directly answers the question, and the example of parents moving so their children can study and find work helps illustrate the benefits. You also identify pressure on city resources and propose improving rural services. However, the negative case is less fully explained than the benefits: the claim that migration burdens city authorities would be stronger with a specific consequence, such as overcrowded housing or strained transport. The recommendations about rural facilities are relevant, but their connection to reducing migration could be developed more explicitly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs discuss reasons and possible solutions, and the conclusion returns to resource balance. Paragraphing generally helps the reader follow the argument, and links such as “Besides this” and “In fact” signal shifts in focus. At times, however, the progression is somewhat mechanical or unclear. “Besides this settlement” does not clearly identify what “this” refers to, and the discussion moves from migrants’ benefits to city pressures without fully connecting those points. The final paragraph repeats the call for government action rather than adding a distinct step in the argument. Use clearer references and make each paragraph advance one connected point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use a relevant range of vocabulary, including “rural areas,” “urban,” “migration,” “resources,” and “modernization,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at more expressive wording, such as “golden opportunities” and “chain reaction.” However, spelling errors and inaccurate or unnatural word choices are noticeable and sometimes distract the reader: examples include “batter life,” “oppertunities,” “facalities,” and “utalization.” Some combinations are also awkward, such as “urban society” and “good civilized city.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than decorative phrases, and proofread spelling carefully. More precise terms for the effects of migration would also help you explain your argument clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional structures such as “If a family moves … parents can get a good job” and clauses beginning with “since.” The overall meaning is usually clear, but some grammatical errors remain in sentence construction, articles, agreement and verb forms. For example, “a family moves … parents can get” shifts awkwardly between a singular subject and plural reference, while “governments should have to provide” combines modal forms incorrectly. “The main focus of them is on a good job” also has an unclear grammatical construction. Work on consistent subject reference, article use and modal patterns, and check punctuation around longer sentences. These improvements would make your varied sentence attempts more controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.