Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The question of whether the movement of villagers to cities is a positive or negative development has sparked an intense social debate. Personally, I unequivocally align with the former view that it is a positive development primarily due more resources of earning in cities. This essay will discuss both the positive and negative impact of this development.

To commence with, the most important effect will be on employment, because of the larger population of the cities, everyone can find best suited opportunity accordingly. Suppose, if an educated person wants to get good job, then no sufficient opportunities are available in countryside. Another important reasons are the healthcare and education facilities, which are still lacking in villages, so in case of any health emergency, villageres rushes to city hospitals. Apart from these, facilities like sports academies, hotels, and malls are available in cities, which eventually improves living standard of the local public. In cities, children can get better education and opportunity to get admission in renowned institutes.

On the flip side, there are so many negative consequences. Nowadays, many of the villagers are moving to the cities, so the villages are becoming empty. And most of the villagers are changing their profession from agriculture to other profession or opting for jobs. Because of this movement, crowd is increasing in cities, so it is becoming difficult for the govenment to provide all amunities and facilities to such a huge crowd. Pollution increament in cities are also because of the growth of city population.

In conclusion, having scrutinized both the perspective, I opine that despite the negative consequenses, still positive developments outweighing the negative effects.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you consider rural-to-urban migration positive overall, and you address both benefits and drawbacks. Relevant points include access to employment, healthcare and education, alongside pressure on city services and pollution. This covers the task well, but some ideas are asserted rather than explained. For example, the claim that “everyone can find best suited opportunity” is too broad, and the effect of villages becoming emptier is mentioned without explaining its consequences. Your conclusion repeats your view but does not clearly summarise why the benefits outweigh the costs. To strengthen the response, develop fewer points with specific explanations or examples and make the comparison behind your final judgement explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting benefits, a paragraph on drawbacks, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To commence with,” “On the flip side,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. However, some linking is mechanical, and the progression within paragraphs could be more deliberate. The employment point, for instance, moves quickly from city population to job opportunities without showing the connection clearly. “Apart from these” also introduces a list of facilities rather than a developed supporting point. Use clearer links between each claim and its explanation, and make references such as “this development” or “these” precise. This would make the organisation more consistently smooth.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of topic vocabulary, including “employment,” “healthcare,” “agriculture,” “pollution,” and “living standard,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “unequivocally” and “scrutinized.” However, inaccurate word choice, collocation and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less natural: “resources of earning,” “best suited opportunity,” “pollution increament,” and “amunities” are examples. Some expressions are also vague or repetitive, such as “facilities” and “negative consequences.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than adding formal-sounding words, and check spelling and word forms. More precise vocabulary would help you express the causes and effects of migration clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “because,” “so,” and “which,” and the overall meaning is generally understandable. However, some sentence structures and agreement patterns are inaccurate. For example, “Suppose, if an educated person wants…” combines two ways of introducing a hypothetical situation, while “villageres rushes” has a subject–verb agreement problem. In “having scrutinized both the perspective,” the phrase does not form a complete, natural conclusion, and “positive developments outweighing” lacks a finite verb. There are also issues with articles, plurals and punctuation in places. Practise building accurate complex sentences and check that each sentence has a clear subject and finite verb before adding more elaborate structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.