Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

This topic is often debated on diffirent platforms that people are leaving to their villages and living in cities day by day. Some people believe that this is positive think for development and progress, while others argue that its provide a nagitive role and destroy our hea lth system. Both side views have their concernes, neverthless in my opinion i strongly believe that transfor to cities is a good way to avail oppertunities and spend better and quilaty life occording to this modern age.

First off all, There are some reasons behind my point of view. The main aim moving ti cities is countriside arieas provide better education, health system and huge rang of employment. people happly go their and sattel. I know cities are more expencive then rural arieas but there are long list of ways to earn money.

On the otherhand those who believe that moving to cities is very harmfull, they have some concernes, cities have many environmental issues there is no availibility of fressh air and those aries contain big poluttion problems. Houses are very small their cost of living is to high. Often time citiesen people suffer from diffirent kind of harmfull disieases due to its nagotive environment problems.

To sumup, i would like to say rural aries are most peicefull and healthfull butt they do not provide facilities that are most nesessrey to being a successfuul person in society that,s why moving ti cities is more importent to face daily bases dificulties and challenges of this glob.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You give a clear overall opinion: you consider movement to cities positive because it can offer education, healthcare, employment and a better quality of life. You also acknowledge disadvantages, including pollution, high living costs and health problems, so the response is relevant to both sides of the question. However, the discussion remains limited and several points are asserted rather than explained. For example, you say there is a “long list of ways to earn money” but do not give an example or show how this outweighs city costs. The conclusion repeats your preference without fully weighing the effects on rural communities. Develop fewer ideas with specific explanations or examples, and make the consequences of rural population decline clearer.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting city migration, a paragraph presenting concerns, and a conclusion. This helps the reader identify your position and follow the broad direction of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and linking expressions are often mechanical or inaccurate. For instance, “On the otherhand” introduces the opposing view, but the paragraph then lists several concerns without showing how they connect. The opening also refers to “some people” and “others” before the essay develops those views, which makes the argument feel formulaic. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each supporting detail to its main point, and use transitions selectively and accurately.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “employment,” “environmental issues,” “cost of living,” and “facilities.” These choices show that you can communicate the main subject and some supporting ideas. However, the range is limited, and frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word choices make parts of the response difficult to read, such as “nagitive,” “poluttion,” “sattel,” and “quilaty.” Some phrases are also unnatural, including “positive think for development” and “face daily bases dificulties.” Work on accurate spelling and common collocations, and choose precise terms rather than relying on broad phrases such as “better” or “many.” Proofreading for word forms and spelling would make your ideas clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a contrast between the benefits and drawbacks of city life. However, the range of sentence structures is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to affect clarity. For example, “Both side views have their concernes” has problems with number and sentence construction, while “cities have many environmental issues there is no…” joins two clauses without suitable punctuation or a connector. There are also recurring problems with articles, verb forms and sentence boundaries, as in “the main aim moving to cities is…” and “Houses are very small their cost of living is to high.” Practise building accurate complete sentences first, then combine them using conjunctions and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.