Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In today's world, villagers are moving to the urban area leading to decrease population in the countryside globally. I firmly believe that, this progression is harmful as it gives rise to overpopulation in cities and less development in small town.
Many people tend to favour live in developed and mega cities, who have been living in small village. They start to move in city for numerous reasons such as quality education, job opportunities, personal growth, asscess technical facilities, and entertainment. Since in rural area people are not able to obtain their necessity, they start to move towards modern cities. It causes in the rise of the over population in urban areas. Due to this, many issued are faced by people like over crowding, high traffic, less resources, need more accommodatio, decreased in job market and many more. All citizens have to face this challenges as many people are moving to the city area.
On the other hand, small town also face negative consequences of low development. As now moving to urban area is becoming increasingly common, people are not giving any attention and priority to live in village worldwide. Owing to this, countryside are being less populate and under development. The public are not providing necessary facilities and infrastructure to maintain population. Moreover, villagers are given less opportunities and modern technologies to grow it's value. For instance, due to less crowd in a rural area, government is not providing proper electricity.
In conclusion, around the world many people are fond to move in cities, such that it declines the population of small towns. In my view, it leads to overpopulation in urban area and low advancement in countryside.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
Your position is clear from the introduction: you consider rural-to-urban migration harmful because it contributes to urban overpopulation and weakens development in smaller communities. Both parts of this view are addressed, and the examples of pressure on housing, traffic and resources are relevant. However, some points are asserted rather than explained. For example, the claim that governments provide inadequate electricity because rural areas have fewer residents needs clearer reasoning or a more specific example. The discussion of reduced development also repeats the general idea of fewer facilities without showing in detail how population loss affects services or local economies. Develop these cause-and-effect links and support them with a concrete example to make the argument more complete.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting consequences, and a conclusion that restates your position. Linking phrases such as “On the other hand,” “Owing to this,” and “Moreover” help signal relationships between ideas. However, the progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, and some connections are unclear. In the first body paragraph, the list of reasons for moving is followed by several urban problems, but the link between migration and each problem could be explained more smoothly. Phrases such as “All citizens have to face this challenges” also make the reference unclear. Use fewer list-like sequences and connect each consequence explicitly to the point before it.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “overpopulation,” “job opportunities,” “infrastructure,” and “modern technologies,” and your meaning is generally understandable. There are also attempts at less common phrasing, such as “personal growth” and “necessary facilities.” However, inaccurate word choice, collocation and spelling are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: “asscess technical facilities,” “less populate,” “fond to move,” and “decreased in job market” are not natural or correctly formed expressions. Some wording is also repetitive, particularly references to moving to cities and low development. Build accuracy by learning common word partnerships and checking spelling and word forms; this will make your vocabulary more precise and fluent.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a reason clause beginning “Since” and a conditional-style explanation with “As now moving to urban area is becoming increasingly common.” The main ideas remain understandable, but errors occur across sentence structures, agreement, articles, plurals and punctuation. For example, “small town also face” needs a plural subject and matching verb, while “All citizens have to face this challenges” has a mismatch between the determiner and noun. The opening also has an unnecessary comma after “believe.” Some longer sentences are awkwardly constructed, which makes relationships between clauses less clear. Practise building accurate sentences with one main idea and a supporting clause, then check agreement, articles and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.