Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many countries, an increasing number of people leaving rural areas and moving to cities. As a result, the population of the countryside is decreasing. Although it provide some economic benefits, I believe it is largely a negative development because it causes serious issue for rural and urban communities. The pros and cons will be discussed in the below paragraphs.

One of the major advantage of urban migration is that many people may have access ti better life opportunities such as good schooling , better transportation and infrastructure, high paying jobs. Therefore, many youngsters in order to provide better living for their families shift to urban areas and can be benefitted with great things like innovations and technology.

However, the disadvantages of this trend are more significant .

Mainly, the continuous loss of young and talented workforce can weaken rural communities. Agriculture and harvesting industries may face crisis due to shortage of labour and farmers causing of shortage of crops and food production. Furthermore, villages may gradually reduce schools, colleges, shops due to less population. In addition to this, urbanization may create lot of pressure on cities. A sudden increase in population causes over crowding, traffic jams, pollution and unemployment. People may not have proper access to urban services and advantages.

After considering all the points , i would like to conclude that moving in cities would improve daily life standards but have negative impact in society. Once, Government should invest in rural areas as well to provide good quality of education, healthcare, employment and infrastructure.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both the positive and negative aspects of rural-to-urban migration, ultimately taking a clear position that it is a negative development. The ideas are relevant, such as the economic benefits for individuals versus the strain on urban infrastructure and the decline of rural industries. However, the development of these points is somewhat superficial. For instance, the impact on rural communities is mentioned but could be further supported with more specific examples or deeper analysis. The conclusion is a bit abrupt and introduces a new suggestion (government investment) rather than summarizing the main arguments presented in the body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'However', 'Furthermore', and 'In addition to this', which help guide the reader through the argument. However, there is some mechanical use of these devices, and the flow between sentences is occasionally choppy. The referencing is generally clear, though the transition between the introduction and the first body paragraph is slightly abrupt. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the different aspects of the argument, contributing to an overall coherent structure.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'urban migration', 'workforce', 'infrastructure', and 'urbanization'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'can be benefitted with great things' and 'causing of shortage of crops'. The range is sufficient to communicate the message, but it lacks the precision and flexibility required for a higher band score. Some phrasing is slightly repetitive, and the use of 'great things' is too informal for an academic essay.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors throughout the text, such as 'it provide' (subject-verb agreement), 'access ti' (typo), 'one of the major advantage' (pluralization error), and 'moving in cities' (preposition error). While these errors are noticeable, they do not significantly impede communication. The punctuation is generally functional, though there are some inconsistencies in spacing and capitalization. To improve, the writer should focus on subject-verb agreement and more accurate use of prepositions in complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.