Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

To begin with the statement, In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Some poeple believe that, moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. I agree with this statement, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. In this essay we will discuss both positive and negative side of this problem.

In my view many people moving to cities nowadays for better opportunity seeking job and many things which are not available in village. This types of trend negatively effect in countryside addressing different effect like, lack of job opportunity lack of infrastructure and many things. In oure country Nepal many people moving to cities for better education better helth option and better job opportunity.

Moreover, In many countries in this time rural area also in the phase of development of different educational building, Hospital and also create employment opportunity to the rural people. It helps to maintain sustainability and availability of different items in one place. It helps to maintain the population of countryside and promote peace and security in this place.

In conclusion, In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. People are moving to cities for better education, seeking for better job opportunity and different accommodation facility. Government sould maintain this trend and start to develop different infrastructure in countryside to balance and provide them with better education,so the population in the countryside is maintain properly.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the task only partially. Instead of presenting a clear personal position on whether the movement of rural people to cities is a positive or negative development, the introduction confusingly claims to discuss 'both positive and negative side' despite the prompt asking for a definitive opinion. Furthermore, the text heavily relies on repetitive copying of the prompt and instructions, such as 'In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing,' which wastes valuable space and contributes very little original content. Ideas related to better opportunities, education, and health options are introduced but remain limited and under-developed, lacking specific support or elaboration beyond general assertions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is some organisation, but the response lacks a clear overall progression. The introduction is particularly disjointed, featuring repetitive sentences and a contradictory announcement about discussing both sides rather than maintaining a consistent stance. Paragraphing is attempted, but the paragraphs do not flow logically from one to the next; for instance, the second paragraph abruptly introduces problems in the countryside, while the third shifts to rural development without smooth transitional phrasing. Cohesive devices are used mechanically and repetitively, such as 'Moreover,' 'In conclusion,' and 'In many countries,' which fails to connect ideas naturally and makes the progression difficult to follow at times.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The writer relies heavily on basic, repetitive phrasing, continually reusing words and phrases like 'better opportunity,' 'better education,' and 'moving to cities' throughout the essay. There are noticeable lexical errors and inappropriate word choices, such as 'helth' (spelling), 'effect' instead of 'affect,' and awkward collocations like 'seeking job and many things' and 'accommodation facility.' While communication is achieved despite these limitations, the constant repetition of vocabulary and lack of less common items restrict the effectiveness of the expression.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of sentence structures, consisting mostly of simple sentences and faulty attempts at complex clauses. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues like 'Government sould maintain this trend,' missing articles, incorrect prepositions, and poor punctuation. For example, clauses are often strung together incorrectly without proper conjunctions, as seen in 'many people moving to cities nowadays for better opportunity seeking job.' These frequent errors cause difficulty and strain for the reader, and the lack of error-free complex structures prevents the writing from achieving a higher level of accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.