Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In recent years, a majority of individuals leaving their villages and moving to the mega cites or mentropolitian cities, so as a result , the population of countryside is falling. So as per my opinion, this a positive development for many nations and I will discuss in the following paragraphs.

There are multiple positive developments of moving to the cities. The first and foremost better career opportunities. In other words, cities provide many schools and collages ,so children can easily gain their knowledge and improve their career for their better future.Also, cities provide a more employment prospective so as a results, more and more people can work for their better lifestyle and give facilities for their families such as medical treatments and healthy food. It is beneficial for their families. For example, in India , a wide range of individuals moving to the huge cities and improve their life and their families life.

Furthermore, in mega cities people can working in sucessful companies and offices this, is not possible in rural areas,so as per my opinion this is positive development for the many families.Also, they can live in better places such as a new house which has a more facilities. So this is a positive developments .

In conclusion, transfering to the cities is the positive development for the individuals because they can take better lifestyle and cities provide more facilities to the people such as career.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You state a clear overall view that rural-to-urban migration is positive, and you give relevant reasons, especially access to education, employment, healthcare and improved living conditions. However, the response addresses the issue only partially because these points are mostly asserted rather than explained or supported with specific examples. The reference to India is very general and does not show how migration improves people’s lives. The second body paragraph largely repeats the claims about jobs and facilities instead of adding a distinct reason. The response is also 13 words below the required minimum. To strengthen the argument, explain the effects of one or two reasons in more detail and include a concrete example, while briefly acknowledging a possible disadvantage before reaffirming your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Basic signposting such as “Furthermore” and “In conclusion” helps the reader follow the overall direction, and the positive position remains consistent. However, progression within the body is limited: the second paragraph repeats the first paragraph’s points about employment and facilities rather than developing a new stage of the argument. Linking phrases such as “so as a result” and “so as per my opinion” are repeated and sometimes make connections feel mechanical. Some sentences also run ideas together, which weakens the flow. Give each body paragraph a distinct main point, then use clear references and transitions to show how each example supports it.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “career opportunities,” “employment,” “medical treatments” and “facilities.” There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “mega cities” and “employment prospective.” However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling, word-form and collocation errors make the writing less natural, for example “mega cites,” “mentropolitian,” “collages,” “sucessful” and “a more facilities.” Some phrases are also vague or repetitive, particularly “better lifestyle” and “positive development.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations and more precise wording—for instance, describe access to “higher-paying jobs” or “public services” rather than repeating general references to facilities. Proofreading spelling and word forms would improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, and the response is generally understandable. However, the range of structures is limited, and attempts to combine clauses often contain frequent errors. For example, “The first and foremost better career opportunities” is a sentence fragment, while “people can working” uses an incorrect verb form. There are also problems with articles, agreement and sentence construction in phrases such as “this a positive development,” “a more facilities,” and “cities provide a more employment prospective.” Punctuation is inconsistent, with spaces before commas and commas separating clauses incorrectly. Practise building complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check verb forms, articles and singular/plural agreement before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.