Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, several Individuals are migrating globally, village citizens are stepping towards cities, therefore the number of people in the countryside is decreasing. From my perspective, I see it as a positive development because due to urbanisation the local individuals get the opportunity to achive things easily by not having huge compatation and also having less population could help in cleaning the environment more easily.

To begin with, over years citizens of numerious countries started moving abroad as well as in city. However, this situation has created a positive impact in the society. Large scale movement of public it had given a big chance for local to achieve their goals easily because of not huge number of individuals. For example, in Germany apporximately 1.2 million people move to different country and by this it created large amount of jobs where public and work in good salary.

Furthermore, having less population in nation has one more benefit as it helps environment to remain clean and less energy is required to clean it. In addition, if any country a huge population like India then it is hard to maintain cleaness in society. If we compare small nations like The Netherlands which have very less citizens then it is easy to maintain cleaness out there.

The regorous analysis leads to the conclusion that, decline in number of people in a nation can be little difficult but it create many positives like better opportunity in the socitey and also less population leads to clean environment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you consider rural-to-urban migration positive, and you give two relevant reasons—greater opportunities and easier environmental management. The response also includes examples involving Germany, India and the Netherlands. However, the ideas are only partly developed, which limits how fully the task is addressed. The Germany example discusses people moving abroad and job creation, rather than clearly showing how rural residents moving to cities gain opportunities; the link to your main argument is therefore unclear. The environmental point is also asserted rather than explained with specific effects or evidence. Develop each reason with a clear cause-and-effect explanation and use examples that directly illustrate rural-to-urban migration.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs signalled by “To begin with” and “Furthermore,” and a conclusion. This makes the main position and supporting points easy to locate. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and some linking is mechanical. For instance, “However” introduces a positive impact without a clear contrast, while “In addition” connects ideas that would benefit from a more explicit explanation. The Germany example also shifts from migration to job creation without showing the connection. Use linking phrases to express precise relationships, and make each paragraph develop one reason in a logical sequence from claim to explanation to relevant example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “urbanisation,” “population,” “opportunity” and “environment,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “The rigorous analysis leads to the conclusion.” However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation and spelling errors make parts of the response difficult to interpret. Examples include “compatation,” “cleaness,” “socitey” and “numerious”; phrases such as “citizens are stepping towards cities” and “achieve things easily” are also unnatural or imprecise. Aim for accurate, natural combinations such as “move from rural areas to cities,” “access employment opportunities” and “maintain environmental cleanliness.” Proofreading spelling and choosing precise collocations would make your meaning clearer.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a reason clause with “because” and a conditional example beginning “if any country…”. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors in sentence construction and agreement sometimes make the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “Large scale movement of public it had given a big chance” combines incompatible sentence patterns, while “if any country a huge population like India” is missing a verb. In “it create many positives,” the verb does not agree with its subject. Practise building complete clauses with clear subjects and verbs, and check agreement, articles and punctuation. More accurate control of these patterns will make your arguments easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.