Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The growing prevalence of moving to cities from countryside has become a considerable issue in recent years. Although cities are full of modern facilities and amenities, I believe that this is a negative development for a country.

One of the strongest reasons for my position is that it makes the cities more crowded, an issue that has become increasingly common is today's world. This is primarily because of the migration of rural people, making cities considerably challenging to live with proper facilities. As a result, it plays a pivotal role in increasing the living expenses because of high demands, while promoting traffic problems in different areas. A compelling example can be observed in Dhaka, capital city of Bangladesh, where population is becoming more dense, allowing more traffic in that area, clearly demonstrating the practical experiences of this movement of rural people. Therefore, supporters believe that giving greater priority to city life would generate substantial drawbacks.

Another convincing reason is that the production of food are reducing day by day because of moving to cities in search of individual's better opportunities. an approach capable of producing equally meaningful challenges. This is largely because the maximum food are sourced from the countryside where farmers produce foods what we consume. The tendency of leaving the rural area can adversely affect the total food production, enabling food shortage in a city whole enhancing the demand. More importantly, the shortage of food would foster healt related problem, boost unemployement problems in cities, and lay the foundation for the upcoming major issues creating from it. For instance, Pirijkandi, a small village of Bangladesh, are facing this problem and importing foods from other areas to meet its demands, illustrating the terribleness of this approach.

In conclusion, people are willing to move to cities for better opportunities, such as better jobs and modern facilities. However, I strongly believe that this migration is a negative development because if offers greater long-term disadvantages both individuals and country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you consider rural-to-urban migration a negative development. You address the question with two relevant reasons—pressure on city services and reduced food production—and support them with examples from Dhaka and Pirijkandi. This covers the task well, and the city-crowding argument is explained through higher living costs and traffic. However, some points are less fully developed: the link between food shortages and unemployment or health problems is asserted rather than explained, and the village example would be more persuasive with clearer detail about how migration has affected local production. Developing these connections and making the examples more precise would strengthen the response further.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs organised around separate reasons, and a conclusion that restates your view. Signposting such as “One of the strongest reasons,” “Another convincing reason,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the progression. Some cohesion is less controlled, however. The sentence beginning “an issue that has become increasingly common” is awkwardly attached to the preceding clause, and the fragment “an approach capable of producing equally meaningful challenges” interrupts the second paragraph’s argument. The repeated use of “This is primarily because” and “This is largely because” also makes linking somewhat mechanical. Use complete, clearly connected sentences and vary transitions to make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary and make attempts at more formal or less common expressions, including “pivotal role,” “substantial drawbacks,” and “adversely affect.” These choices help communicate the main ideas, and the topic-specific language about migration, food production, and traffic is relevant. Some collocations and word choices are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “challenging to live with proper facilities,” “food are sourced,” and “the terribleness of this approach.” There are also spelling errors in “healt” and “unemployement.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and naturalness. Prefer familiar, accurate combinations and check spelling; for example, describe pressure on facilities or say that food production is declining.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including clauses introduced by “Although,” “because,” and “where,” and most of the argument remains understandable. Some grammatical errors persist, particularly with agreement, sentence construction, and articles. For example, “the production of food are reducing” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “where population is becoming more dense” needs an article before “population.” The opening of the second body paragraph also contains a sentence fragment: “an approach capable of producing equally meaningful challenges.” In the conclusion, “because if offers” should use “it,” and the comparison needs a clearer grammatical structure. Review agreement and ensure each sentence has a complete main clause; this would make your varied structures more reliable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.