Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-07-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment.

What damage does plastic do to the environment?

What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Nowadays, people are overusing plastic products such as plastic bags,plastic containers and so forth. That proved bad and creates detrimental effects on an environment. This essay will discuss the negative effects on the environment done by plastic and provide some ardent steps can be done by citizens and by national authorities to curb this situation.

To commence, plastic products can do major damage to the environment. First of all, low quality plastics are non biodegradable. In result, many countries across the world have plastic mountains. That not only ruin the environment but also it will take thousand of years to eliminate from the earth. It has been also observed that the componies which manufacturing the plastic products those emission dangerous gases in the environment such as Carbon monoxide, Nitrogen Oxide. That leads to glabal warming effects. Furthermore, plastic products have many negative effects on human's well being. For example, warming a frozen food in low quality palstic containers, food products preserve in a plastic packaging for a long period of time can do chemical reactions with palstic which make food dangerous to eat. That leads to cancer in humankind.

To adress the second question, It is a responsibility of an individual and the government to take nacessory actions to prevent and solve this damage. As a citizen of the country, individual should avoid use of single use plastic things. Every shop keepers, owner of rstaurants should promote echofreindly products and encourage their buyers to use high quality,paper or clothe bags for multitime uses. Government would play a crucial role to stop harmful effects of plastion on nature. The government should set up strict legislation on the manufacturer componies of plastic. Government should bane on the production of single use plastic materials. Furthermore, government can also run awareness programme, do advertisement and promote those products in the public which can be recycle or reuse.

In conclusion, plastic can do negative effects on the environment such as polution because it takes thousand of years to degredation. Plastic containers also increase the chance of cancers and ruin overall health of humans. As a citizen, it is a public responsibility to use of biodegradble products, shoup keepers or componies should promote use of ulternative things for example paperbag or reusable plastic products. Government should run public awarenes programmes for citizens to avoid an use of plastic and should set up strict legislation on production of plastic things.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, identifying environmental damage and suggesting solutions for both individuals and governments. The ideas are relevant, such as the mention of non-biodegradable waste and the need for legislation. However, the development of these ideas is somewhat superficial. For instance, the link between plastic containers and cancer is stated as a fact without sufficient explanation or nuance. While the position is clear throughout, the response would benefit from more detailed examples or a more sophisticated exploration of the consequences of plastic use to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To commence', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions feel mechanical or slightly repetitive. There are also instances where referencing is unclear, such as the phrase 'That proved bad' in the introduction, which lacks a specific antecedent. While the overall progression of ideas is coherent, the use of cohesive devices is not always flexible or natural, which limits the score to a 6.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their meaning clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'non-biodegradable', 'legislation', and 'emissions'. However, there are frequent spelling errors (e.g., 'componies', 'glabal', 'nacessory', 'echofreindly', 'ulternative') and some awkward collocations (e.g., 'ardent steps', 'do chemical reactions'). These errors are noticeable and occasionally distract the reader, though they do not prevent the message from being understood. A wider range of precise vocabulary would improve the score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is generally clear, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'componies which manufacturing', 'government would play'), article usage, and pluralization (e.g., 'thousand of years', 'shop keepers'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and incorrect capitalization. These errors are frequent enough to be noticeable, although they rarely impede communication. To improve, the student should focus on basic sentence construction and proofreading for common grammatical slips.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.