Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment.

What damage does plastic do to the environment?

What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In recent times, concerns related to environment have been expanded rapidly, becoming a major threat for the globe. Due to this, some people believe that plastic materials are detrimental for the environment, and imposes several significant drawbacks in the world such as ocean pollution and climate change which are resolved by not only lunching campaigns but also smaller preventing steps taken by household.

First and foremost, usage of plastic leads ocean and marine pollution. To illustrate, manufacture industries are using plasic material owing to it’s cheaper price, and after single time usage, they tend to dispose this material in rivers and oceans, eventually it spreads pollution in the ocean. Besides this, this garbage is consumed by marine species, as a result, the might face serious injury or death.

In addition to that, plastic products are the major part of climate change since companies who are creating plastic bags and bottles mainly relies on fossil fuels in order to make production which contribute in carbon emission and climate change. Hence, it imposes few terrible effects in order to make air polluted.

Nevertheless, despite having considerable disadvantages, it could be resolved by taking preventing steps of launching campaigns in which government can demonstrate plenty of harmful effects to the environment and human itself. Consequently, individuals could inculcate a few habits of utilising the alternative option in lieu of plastic. Moreover, community plays a crucial role in reducing remarkable proportion of plastic in the environment. For example, people may foster the usage of either glass or copper container instead of plastic boxes for preserving leftover meals, and paper bags should be used by folks in order to prompte reusable products. Thus, these smaller steps are vital in saving environment from being polluted.

To conclude, the expanded utilization of plastic materials are harmful for not only ocean and marin life but also plays a facaniating part in climate change. Although having negative effects, people may fix it by avoiding plastic at home and attending educative campaigns .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, identifying environmental damage (ocean pollution, climate change) and proposing solutions (government campaigns, individual behavioral changes). The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed. However, the development is occasionally hindered by imprecise language, such as the phrase 'lunching campaigns' (likely meaning 'launching') and the slightly vague suggestion that individuals should 'inculcate a few habits'. While the position is clear throughout, the depth of analysis could be improved by providing more specific examples of government policy beyond just 'campaigns'. Overall, the response meets the requirements of the task effectively.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. The progression of ideas is generally smooth, moving from the problem to the solutions. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'First and foremost', 'In addition to that', and 'Nevertheless', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are slightly mechanical or awkward, such as 'Due to this' at the start of the introduction. Additionally, referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the use of 'it' in 'eventually it spreads pollution', where the antecedent is slightly ambiguous. Despite these minor issues, the overall structure is coherent and easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, including terms like 'detrimental', 'fossil fuels', and 'carbon emission'. There are several instances of word-choice errors and spelling mistakes, such as 'plasic', 'marin', 'prompte', and the misuse of 'facaniating' (likely intended to be 'significant' or 'substantial'). The phrase 'lunching campaigns' is also a notable error. While these errors do not impede communication, they indicate a lack of precision. To reach a higher band, the student should focus on accurate spelling and more natural collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('plastic materials... imposes', 'companies... relies') and article usage errors ('leads ocean and marine pollution'). Some sentences are slightly awkward, such as 'it imposes few terrible effects in order to make air polluted'. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. The student should focus on proofreading for basic agreement and ensuring that complex structures are formed correctly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.