Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment.

What damage does plastic do to the environment?

What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In comtemporary society, usage of plastic materials are increasing day by day. Plastic bags, plastic bottles and plastic packaging are harmful for the environment. This things can damage the environment in several ways, while the government and citizens can solve the issue in various ways. This essay will explicated both the aspects in the upcoming paragraphs along with relevant examples.

There are several damages can occur to the environment due to the plastics. One of them is that plastics do not decompose in the soil and keep deteriorate the condition of the soil. Moreover, plastics are very dangerous for the human health. To elucidate, doctors are not allowing to drink water from plastics utensils, as it can give a diseases. To exmeplify, some villages in India, villagers always away from usage plastics bottles and they usually use clay pot for drinking water because it is beneficial for the health.

There are certain things should government and individuals can do for resolving this problem. The government can put banned on plastics materials and if individuals produce illegally, then there should be a penalty of the money to the company. Furthermore, Individuals should buy eco-friendly materials for packings to save the environment. Individuals can also use paper bags in day to day life. For instance, companies such as Zara, they usually use paper bags for packaging.

To recapitulate, plastics materials can damage the soil as well as harmful for the human health. However, it can be solved by implementing a banned on the production of plastics and individuals should try to use paper bags and eco-friendly materials for daily routine.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both questions: it identifies soil deterioration and possible health risks, then proposes government restrictions and individual choices such as paper bags. The examples about clay pots in Indian villages and Zara’s paper bags help make the suggestions more concrete. However, the environmental damage is explained less fully than the proposed solutions. For instance, the essay says plastic “keep[s] deteriorate the condition of the soil” but does not explain how long-lasting waste affects land or wildlife; the health claim is also broad and unsupported. Develop each point with a clearer cause-and-effect explanation and ensure examples directly support the claim. The introduction signals both parts, but the essay’s discussion of damage could be more specific.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for environmental damage and solutions, and a conclusion. This makes the response easy to follow, and signposts such as “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” and “To recapitulate” show the intended relationships between ideas. The progression within paragraphs is generally understandable, though some links feel mechanical, and references such as “This things” are not clear or accurate. The damage paragraph also moves from soil to human health without explaining the connection, while the conclusion repeats the main points rather than drawing them together. To strengthen cohesion, use more precise referencing and connect each example explicitly to the point it illustrates.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses enough topic vocabulary to communicate its main ideas, including “decompose,” “eco-friendly materials,” “penalty,” and “production.” It also attempts more formal expressions such as “To elucidate” and “To recapitulate.” However, several word choices, collocations, and spelling errors make the language noticeably unnatural: “comtemporary,” “exmeplify,” “put banned on,” and “a penalty of the money” are examples. “Plastics materials” and “materials for packings” are also imprecise. These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the overall message, but they limit precision and fluency. Prioritise accurate, natural combinations such as “impose a ban on plastic” and “charge companies a fine.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay attempts both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “villagers … who usually use clay pot” and a conditional structure beginning “if individuals produce illegally.” The main ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “usage of plastic materials are increasing” has a subject–verb agreement problem, and “This things can damage” has a demonstrative and plural mismatch. Other examples include “There are several damages can occur” and “There are certain things should government and individuals can do,” where clause structure is incomplete or faulty. Articles and plurals also need attention, as in “a diseases” and “clay pot.” Practise building complete clauses and checking agreement, articles, and plural forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.