Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-18

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

You have just read an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centres in your country all look very similar to each other. You don't fully agree with this opinion.

Write a letter to the editor of the newspaper. In your letter

• say which points in the article you agree with
• explain ways in which your town centre is different from most other town centres
• offer to give a guided tour of your town to the writer of the article

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I have recently read an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centres in my country all look very similar to each other. I completely agree with this opinion as most of the town center are build by the city municiple office. The overall layout and design for the town center are kept similar which make people easy to access and nevigate whenever they visit there. Despite having similarities , town center in my city have some differences.

Firstly , the are where it is located is a historical city. All the architecture and design are heaily influce by the local arts and tradition. Although the outer layout looks similar to other town center, the shops and items that are available are locally sourced and have cultural significane. The arts and decoration showcases the local belief and local talents.

Inspite of becoming different from most of the other town centers, many people mistake them as a same with others. I want people to come and visit our town center and get to know different cultural experience. If possible you can visit our town center to explore and feel the difference in person. I would be more tha happy to guid you for the tour and describe the cultural aspects on town center. Hoping to hear from you soon.

Regards.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The candidate has addressed all parts of the prompt appropriately. They successfully mentioned which points in the article they agree with, such as the general layout and municipal involvement. They also explained ways in which their town centre differs, highlighting its historical architecture and locally sourced items, and they concluded by offering a guided tour to the writer. The tone is appropriate for a formal letter to a newspaper editor. However, there is a slight contradiction in the opening where the candidate states they completely agree with the article's claim that all town centres look similar, yet the prompt asks to disagree or partially disagree and explain differences. Despite this slight logical hiccup, all bullet points are covered adequately, earning a solid band score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The letter is organised into clear paragraphs, each dealing with a distinct part of the task. Cohesive devices are used to guide the reader, such as 'Firstly', 'Although', and 'Inspite of'. However, some of these transitions and referencing elements are slightly awkward or mechanically applied, such as 'mistake them as a same with others'. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, the body paragraphs discussing similarities and differences, and the concluding offer for a tour. The progression of ideas is generally clear, moving logically from agreement on the general layout to specific local differences and finally to the invitation.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The candidate uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'municiple', 'architechture', 'culturally significant', and 'locally sourced'. There are, however, noticeable spelling and word choice errors throughout the text, including 'center' (spelled interchangeably with centre), 'build' instead of 'built', 'nevigate', 'heaily', 'influce', 'significane', and 'tha'. While these errors occasionally distract, they do not impede overall communication. The writer demonstrates a sufficient range to convey their message, but precision is lacking in places, restricting the score to a 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response features a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, using conditional and concessive clauses such as 'Although the outer layout looks similar...' and 'If possible you can visit...'. There are frequent grammatical and punctuation errors, including subject-verb agreement issues like 'town center in my city have' and prepositional slips like 'guid you for the tour'. Articles are occasionally omitted or misused. Despite these errors, the sentence structures show some variety and meaning is generally clear, meaning communication is rarely impeded by the grammatical lapses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.