Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

You have just read an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centres in your country all look very similar to each other. You don't fully agree with this opinion.

Write a letter to the editor of the newspaper. In your letter

• say which points in the article you agree with
• explain ways in which your town centre is different from most other town centres
• offer to give a guided tour of your town to the writer of the article

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am writing regarding your article that has recently published in the newspaper about "Town Centers in Egypt, are the all the same", could you please allow me to partly disagree with many points in the article.

On the one hand, I firmly agree that ancient architect in many Egyptian governrates city centers is somewhat similar. All buildings that are similar are dated to the same historical period. which may give you that thought about the similarity.

On the other hand, many historical buildings are being removed recently and being replaced with contemporary buildinds and modern stores. In my hometown, you will see different stores, restaurants, clothes shops, and malls. All these shops gives an impression of modernaity that differentiate of other town's centers.

I would like to invite you to visit my town Asyut. I can arrange an amuse tour for you in the city center. I will happily accompany you and give you many explanations about historical buildings that still exist.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours faithfully.

Diana

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your letter covers all three requested points and makes your position clear: you partly disagree, acknowledge similarities in historic architecture, describe changes in Asyut, and offer the writer a tour. The contrast between older buildings and newer shops gives a relevant reason why your town may look different. However, the explanation is not equally developed throughout. The point about similar architecture is brief, and the claim that modern shops distinguish Asyut from other centres would be more convincing with a specific local feature or example. The tour offer is clear, but “an amuse tour” does not explain what the visitor would see. More precise supporting details would make the response fuller and more persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The letter has a clear overall progression: it introduces your response to the article, presents agreement and disagreement in separate paragraphs, then makes the invitation and closes politely. The signposts “On the one hand” and “On the other hand” help readers follow the contrast, and the ideas are grouped appropriately. Some linking is a little mechanical, and the reference in “All buildings that are similar” is unclear because it does not specify which buildings are meant. The transition from the general point about recent redevelopment to the claim about Asyut could also be smoother. Use more precise references and connect the town-specific example directly to the article’s claim.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a suitable range of vocabulary for a formal letter, including “historical period,” “contemporary,” “impression,” and “accompany.” These choices help communicate the contrast between historic architecture and modern development. There are, however, several inaccurate or awkward word choices and spelling errors, such as “ancient architect” for architecture, “governrates,” “buildinds,” “modernaity,” and “amuse tour.” “Differentiate of other town’s centers” is also an imprecise collocation. These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding your main points, but they limit precision and naturalness. Check spelling carefully and choose established phrases such as “guided tour” and “set it apart from other town centres.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including the relative clause in “buildings … which may give you that thought” and the sentence describing what you can show the visitor. The main message remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect accuracy. For example, “that has recently published” needs a passive form (“that was recently published”), and “All these shops gives” has a subject–verb agreement error. The opening sentence also joins a question-like request to the preceding clause with a comma, creating a faulty sentence boundary. Capitalisation after “period” and punctuation in the closing need attention. Aim to produce a few more accurate complex sentences while checking verb forms, agreement, and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.