Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

You have just read an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centres in your country all look very similar to each other. You don't fully agree with this opinion.

Write a letter to the editor of the newspaper. In your letter

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Dear Sir,

I am writing regarding your recent article "All Town Centres Look the Same"

published on 20th October in your newspaper. I read it with great interset.

To some extent, I agree with your point that many town centres in Pakistan have similar shops, such as international food, chains and mobile shops. It is ture that modernization has made them look quite uniform.

However, I do not fully agree because my town centre in Wah Cantt is quite different. Unlike other towns, our centre has a beautiful historical park in the middle with old trees from the British era. Also we have a traditional bazaar where local craftmen sell handmade pottery which you will not find in other modern town centres.

I would like to invite the writer of the aricle to visit Wah Cantt. I would be happy to give him a guided tour of our town and show him its unique features next weekend.

I look forward to heaing from you.

Yours faithfully,

X . Y . Z

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response7.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.5
Overall7.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

You address all three requirements clearly: you identify the article, acknowledge that international food chains and mobile shops make many centres similar, and explain how Wah Cantt differs through its historical park and traditional bazaar. Your disagreement is clear and sustained, and the invitation to give the writer a guided tour is explicit. The examples make your position relevant and reasonably well supported. To strengthen the response further, develop the comparison a little more precisely: explain what makes the park or pottery bazaar distinctive in practice, rather than relying mainly on the broad claim that these features are not found elsewhere. The letter’s purpose and tone are appropriate overall.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The letter follows a clear progression: you introduce the article, state the point you partly accept, explain your disagreement with local examples, and finish with an invitation and closing. Paragraphing helps the reader distinguish these stages, while transitions such as “To some extent” and “However” make the contrast easy to follow. The ideas within the main paragraph are also logically connected. To make the organisation more polished, ensure the invitation and closing are integrated smoothly with the preceding discussion, and avoid unnecessary spacing that interrupts the visual flow. Overall, the sequence is clear and cohesive, though the linking is fairly straightforward rather than especially flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range for the letter and include some specific vocabulary, such as “historical park,” “traditional bazaar,” “handmade pottery,” and “unique features.” These choices help distinguish Wah Cantt from other centres. However, several spelling errors—“interset,” “ture,” “craftmen,” “aricle,” and “heaing”—show that vocabulary control is not consistently accurate. Some phrasing is also imprecise: “international food, chains” is unclear, and “modern town centres” does not quite express the comparison intended. Proofread spelling and choose more exact collocations to make your descriptions sound natural and precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and more complex sentence forms, including the contrast structure “Unlike other towns” and the relative clause in “pottery which you will not find.” Most sentences communicate their meaning clearly, and the letter’s basic sentence patterns are controlled. Some grammatical and punctuation details still need attention. For example, “Also we have” would read more smoothly with a comma after “Also,” and “I would be happy to give him a guided tour … and show him” shifts from the writer to the visitor without a clear grammatical problem but could be phrased more directly. The range is developing; greater consistency in punctuation and sentence construction would improve accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.