Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people like to try new things, for example, places to visit and types of food. Other people prefer to keep doing things they are familiar with.

Discuss both these attitudes and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

A number of people like to travel new locations or try various types of food instead of following normal routine. Other against this trends and they are comfortable with doing familiar things for their safety. I partially agree with the given statements, visiting different tourist places provide them thrilling experience and eating new meals improve knowledge about diverse spices and flavours. However, following regular activities access them safety and mitigate the chances of unforeseen consequences.

On the one hand, majority of individuals love to do unfamiliar things like exploring new tourist locations or consuming various food, because, it offers them adventurous feeling and breathtaking view of nature. For example, arranging international trips like the UK allow travelers to discover new cultures, traditions, history, art and natural beauty, which would be hard to see in their own country. Moreover, this types of trips would be beneficial for their future by accessing educational and job opportunities. Apart from that, foreign travelling encourage them to develop good communication, critical-thinking and organisation skills for their overall growth. Whereas tying diverse cultural foods promote them to broaden their knowledge regarding numerous spices, flavours and come out from their comfort meals. As a result, it will improve their test sense and can enjoy tempting and delicious cuisines.

On the other hand, routine things have its own advantages for citizens. Such as, travelling to familiar tourist locations every year like Shimla provide them comfort zone and save their time from the arrangement of accommodation, transport and finding famous cuisines. Moreover, they can enjoy a lot and spend quality time with their family while they explore routine locations. Apart from that, eating regular food reduce the chances of health issues and provide them energy throughout the day because it contains plenty of nutrition, minerals and vitamins. On the contrast, abroad trips would be costly, brings health issues in extreme hot or cold weather conditions and address cultural shock for new visitors.

In conclusion, new things offer individuals thrill and adventurous experience, will be responsible for development of professional skills and allows them to discover new cultures, social customs, etiquette and fashion. However, familiar travelling locations and food provide them comfort, health benefits and dwindle down the chances of unforeseen difficulties.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both attitudes and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed, such as the benefits of travel for skill development and the comfort of routine. However, some arguments are slightly over-generalized, and the connection between 'trying new things' and 'future job opportunities' could be more explicitly linked to the prompt. The position is consistent throughout, and the conclusion effectively summarizes the main points. To reach a higher band, ensure that every supporting example directly reinforces the specific attitude being discussed.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two viewpoints. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, there are instances where the flow is slightly mechanical, and some referencing is a bit repetitive. For example, the transition 'On the contrast' is non-standard and slightly disrupts the logical progression. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring smoother transitions between sentences would enhance the overall coherence.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express ideas clearly. There are some attempts at less common vocabulary, such as 'mitigate', 'unforeseen', and 'dwindle', which are used effectively. However, there are several instances of awkward collocations or word choice errors, such as 'access them safety' (instead of 'provide them with safety') and 'test sense' (likely meaning 'taste buds' or 'palate'). These errors do not impede communication but indicate a need for more precise word usage to reach the higher bands.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the writer attempts complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'this types of trips', 'foreign travelling encourage') and preposition usage. Punctuation is generally functional, but there are minor errors that occasionally affect the flow. The errors are noticeable but rarely impede the reader's understanding of the main points. To improve, the writer should focus on subject-verb agreement and refining the use of articles and prepositions.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.