Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that now is the best time in history to be living.

What is your opinion about this?

What other time in history would be interesting to live in?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In my opinion this modern era is absolutely worth it to live in as it is an era of technology and communication along with AI. The revolution is exceptionally impressive but some how there is a sense of lonelinessnowadays something has gone missing, the innocence is worth missing now in this trsansforming world.

I beleive that the 90s era was the best as the world was emerging toewards peace asnd diplomacy. Many agreements such as peace agreement was signed and Rio Conferene was a significant move towards betterment of society, a sense of community was evolved and new technologies were being introduced and apart from that Mobile Phones were invented, after computers which led us connect to other parts of the world.

secondly businesses and multinational corporations developed and technology helped them to florish snd became successful such as the rise of fastfood like KFC and McDonalds replaced the homecooked meals followed by other brands later.

In addition the modern era has gotten it's roots from 90s and now we see today the magnificent giants of it impacting our daily lifestyle,now we completely depends on technology which is now drastically changing and evolving into betterment. it has negative impacts as well such as rise in unemployment and obesity also other health conditions as well .

In Conclusion i would say that every history is worth living in there is no need of changes rather than enjoying and making most from what ever we have today.we can make it much better with our constant efforts and make it a happy place for whole community

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both questions: you say the present is valuable because of technology and communication, and identify the 1990s as another interesting period. The references to diplomacy, the Rio Conference, mobile phones and business provide relevant starting points. However, the opinion about living now is not fully clear: the opening is positive, but the discussion of loneliness and lost innocence complicates it without explaining which view is stronger. The reasons for choosing the 1990s are also broad, and some examples—such as fast-food brands—are not clearly linked to why that decade would be interesting to experience. Develop each main reason with a specific explanation or example, and state your overall position more consistently.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable sequence: an opening view, a discussion of the 1990s, comments on modern technology, and a conclusion. Paragraph breaks help distinguish these stages. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow because several points are joined into long, loosely connected sentences. For example, the paragraph about the 1990s moves from peace agreements to community, mobile phones and computers without showing how the ideas relate. Connectors such as “secondly” and “in addition” signal new points, but they do not always create a clear argument. Use one central idea per paragraph, explain its connection to your opinion, and make references such as “it” and “this” more precise.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “diplomacy,” “multinational corporations,” “emerging,” and “unemployment.” These choices show an effort to discuss social and technological change beyond basic terms. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural combinations are noticeable, including “trsansforming,” “florish,” “sense of community was evolved,” and “roots from 90s.” Some wording also makes the intended meaning less clear, such as “the innocence is worth missing.” Proofread carefully and learn common collocations as complete phrases, rather than selecting ambitious words without checking how they combine. More precise vocabulary would help communicate your ideas smoothly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with clauses, but control is uneven, and several sentences are difficult to process. For example, the opening combines multiple ideas without clear sentence boundaries, while “now we completely depends on technology” has a subject–verb agreement error. Other issues include “peace agreement was signed,” “led us connect,” and inconsistent capitalization and punctuation. These errors sometimes obscure relationships between ideas. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly attached supporting clause, then check agreement, articles, verb patterns and sentence boundaries. Shorter, controlled sentences would make your argument easier to understand while you develop greater variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.