Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average monthly change in prices of copper, nickel and zinc (2014)

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The graph illustrates the monthly change in the prices of three metals like copper ,nickel, and zinc in the year 2014. Nickle's Percentage increased in 1st month while it gets decreasing .

Copper kept in normal change as compared to others and zinc goes in a little different order.

First of all, Cost of Nickel in the year 2014 was 6% in J month .It decreases to 4% in F month.In the month of M and A,it falls up-to 1% and there is only a minor change in the month M.

The graph illustrates a major fall up-to -3% in J month while in month J,A and S there is again -1% transformation.1% transformation occurred in month N,D.

In short , prices of Nickel and zinc are also in same up and down as the prices of nickel.Coppers's ,monthly change is around 0% and 2%.J month having 2 % .On the other hand,D month have only 1.5% .

At the end,Zinc firstly get decreased at 1% while gets increased up-to 3%.It kept increasing and decreasing till the end of month.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 4.0

The response attempts to address the task but fails to provide a clear or accurate summary of the data. The description of the trends is confusing and often contradicts the visual information provided in the graph. For instance, the student describes Nickel's price as 6% in January, which is not supported by the graph, and the terminology used to describe the months (e.g., 'J month', 'F month') is imprecise. The overview is missing, and the key features—such as the significant fluctuations in Nickel and Zinc compared to the relative stability of Copper—are not clearly highlighted or compared. The report lacks the analytical depth required for an Academic Task 1 response.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 4.5

The response is organized into paragraphs, but the progression of ideas is disjointed and difficult to follow. Cohesive devices are used in a very mechanical and often incorrect way, such as 'First of all' and 'At the end', which do not suit the context of a data report. Referencing is frequently unclear, making it difficult for the reader to identify which metal or time period is being discussed. The lack of logical flow between sentences and the repetitive structure hinder the overall coherence of the report.

Lexical Resource — Band 4.5

The vocabulary is very limited and repetitive, relying on basic terms like 'change', 'increased', and 'decreased'. There are frequent errors in word choice and spelling, such as 'Nickle's' and 'Coppers's'. The student struggles to use precise terminology for describing trends, such as 'transformation' used incorrectly to describe price changes. The range of vocabulary is insufficient to convey the information accurately, and the errors occasionally impede the reader's understanding of the data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

The response contains frequent grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('Zinc firstly get decreased'), article usage, and sentence structure. Punctuation is inconsistent, with many missing or misplaced spaces after commas and periods. While there is an attempt to use complex sentences, they are often poorly constructed and contain errors that cause difficulty for the reader. The control of basic grammar is weak, and the frequent errors significantly detract from the clarity of the writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.