Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average monthly change in prices of copper, nickel and zinc (2014)

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given graph illustrates the average monthly change in the rate of three metals during 2014.The calliberation of data is in percentage.

From the overall point of view,Nickel started decreasing from begining and rose from middle. Where as Zinc grew at begining and flucated till end and copper shows same result as zinc .

At begning,Nickel started with 6% in January and started to decreas till march and reaches 1% and then remain satble for certain period of time .Copper remain the most unstable metal among three and shows dramatically changes and reaches -3% in June and 1% at the end of year in December.

Copper started with 2% in January and ramain unstable and flucated june and reaches around -0.5% and almost 2% in December.where as Zinc started with 1% and shows instant growth and reaches 3% in February then declined continouslyand reached -1% in June and started to climb again and remained stable for three month. Zinc shows huge jump and reaches 2% at the end and it is the most positive response among all three metal.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several important features, including nickel’s high starting point, its fall to around 1%, and the metals’ recovery towards the end of the year. However, the overview is not consistently accurate: nickel did not simply “start decreasing from begining and rose from middle”; it fell sharply through June, then recovered later. The claim that copper was “the most unstable” and changed dramatically is misleading, since nickel shows much larger fluctuations. Some details are also repeated, while key comparisons—such as nickel’s June low of about -3%—are not clearly distinguished from copper’s smaller fall. To strengthen the response, give a concise, accurate overview and select a few precise comparisons across the year rather than repeating descriptions of individual metals.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details about the metals. This gives the reader some organisation, and the months generally follow a chronological order. However, progression is weakened by repetition: copper is described in both the third and fourth paragraphs, and the overview’s claims are revisited without adding a clear comparison. Linking expressions such as “Where as” and “and then” are used mechanically, while the relationship between ideas is sometimes unclear—for example, the overview says zinc fluctuated “till end” but does not explain its late rise. Grouping the metals’ shared mid-year decline and end-year recovery would create a clearer progression and reduce repetition.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “percentage,” “declined,” “stable,” “fluctuated,” and “reaches,” so the main trends can usually be understood. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or awkward: “caliberation of data” does not describe the graph’s measurement, and “most positive response” is not a natural way to describe a price change. Repeated use of “started,” “reaches,” and “shows” also makes the account less precise. Spelling errors such as “begining,” “flucated,” and “continously” are noticeable and reduce clarity. Use standard trend language consistently, such as “rose,” “fell,” “remained,” and “recovered,” and check spelling and collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and longer sentences, but control is inconsistent, and errors frequently make the reading less smooth. For example, “Nickel started with 6% in January and started to decreas till march and reaches 1%” shifts tense and has an unclear sequence of verb forms. Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also problematic: the introduction runs directly into “The calliberation,” and several sentences begin with lowercase “whereas” or join separate ideas with commas. There are also missing articles and agreement issues, as in “among all three metal.” Use past tense consistently for the 2014 data, form complete sentences, and punctuate comparisons carefully. Shorter, accurately controlled sentences would improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.