Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average monthly change in prices of copper, nickel and zinc (2014)

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph illustrates the comparison of prince change between 3 different metal copper, nickel and zinc in an moth in the year 2014.

As seen in chart, nickel with 6% which had a highest from others in the first month of the year. it showed continuous decline in next 6 months and in June it was on -3% which the lowest. After that number rose and reached to a constant at 1%. Copper started with 2% of average monthly price change in January and it also followed the same trend like nickel and in June it was at their lowest with -0.5%. In the second half of the year price change in copper surpassed nickel with some fluctuation and reached in profit at 1.8%. Initially zinc start with 1% of average price change and it showed opposite and the number rose in first month, after that it showed decline phase and in June it reached to -1%. In the last 6 months of the year the number were increased and in December the zinc performed better than copper and nickel and achieved the 2% of price change on monthly basis.

To conclude, in the first month of 2014 the nickel was at the topped and zinc at the bottom, but at the end of the year showed opposite trend and zinc become on topped and nickel at last.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall contrast: nickel begins highest and ends relatively low, while zinc finishes strongest. You also report several key turning points, including nickel’s fall to about −3% in June and zinc’s recovery to around 2% in December. This covers the task, although some details are less fully or accurately developed. For example, copper reaches about 1.5% in December, not 1.8%, and it does not simply follow nickel’s trend: it remains near 0.5% in March and April before turning negative. The claim that zinc rose in the first month is unclear, since January is its starting point; it rises in February. A clearer overview of the shared mid-year decline and late-year recovery would make the main features more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: it moves through the metals, describes changes across the year, and ends with a comparison of the starting and ending positions. Paragraphing also separates the main description from the conclusion. Linking phrases such as “After that,” “In the second half of the year,” and “To conclude” help the reader follow the sequence. However, the organisation is somewhat mechanical, and the long central paragraph shifts between metals without consistently grouping comparable trends. Some references are also unclear, such as “the number” and “it,” which can make it difficult to tell which metal or figure is being discussed. Grouping the shared mid-year falls and subsequent recoveries would create smoother progression and more precise cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary for describing trends, including “continuous decline,” “rose,” “fluctuation,” and “surpassed.” These choices generally communicate the graph’s movement, and the response remains understandable. However, several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision: “prince change” appears to be a misspelling of “price change,” “in profit” is not suitable for a percentage change, and “at the topped” is an unnatural way to describe the highest figure. There are also awkward repetitions of “number” and “showed.” Aim for accurate, conventional chart language such as “percentage change,” “fell to,” “recovered,” and “recorded the highest figure.” Check spelling and use collocations that describe data rather than business profit.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, using time clauses and sequencing, for example, “After that number rose and reached to a constant at 1%.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors recur. These include missing or incorrect articles and agreement (“in an moth,” “the number were increased”), tense and verb-form problems (“Initially zinc start”), and incomplete sentence control after a full stop (“it was the highest… . it showed…”). Comparatives and prepositions also need attention, as in “reached to” and “better than copper and nickel and achieved.” Practise forming accurate past-tense sentences with a clear subject, verb, and comparison. More reliable control of these patterns would make your descriptions easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.