Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some people argue that asking marital status and personal information like intrest and hobbies by employees in job application is relevent while others do not support this veiw.I believe such question are critical for employees as it will help them to evaluate the applicant personality suitable for post. in this essay we will dive into both aspects.

The main reason why intreviewer ask such personal question is to know more about the persons personality.Employer ask about hobbies and interest as they get to know by it whether person is active,creative or sociable.Additionally it will help them decide wether the candidate is a good fit for the particular role and the company culture.For instance if a person does not like meeting people and communicating he would not be consider d good match for jobs like marketing where intraction and being sociable is key skill.

Furthermore, by asking questions regarding marital status ,employer want to check whether the person is flexible in work schedule and relocating if needed .for example a person who has family and children can not devote more hours to work if required as single person could .Although such questions can make some people uncomfortable .

In contrast ,some people consider such questions irrelevent and breach of their privacy .Revealing personal information may create discrimination between employees especially womens may face unfair treatment because of there marital statuas.

In my opinion ,asking sucghh question is crucial for any employer from the candidate as their decisions will affect company future .

TO conclude ,

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both views and state a position: you argue that personal questions can help employers assess suitability, while also noting privacy and discrimination concerns. The examples about sociability in marketing and family responsibilities make the discussion relevant. However, the response only partially develops the task: the claim that marital status indicates flexibility is presented as a general assumption, and the opposing view receives much less explanation than the supporting view. Your opinion is also difficult to interpret because you call the questions “crucial” without distinguishing hobbies from sensitive details such as marital status. Develop both sides more evenly and give a clearer, qualified position—for example, that job-related interests may be useful but marital status should not influence hiring.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction to supporting reasons, a contrasting view, and a conclusion. Paragraphs generally group related points, and signposts such as “Additionally,” “Furthermore,” and “In contrast” help show the intended relationships. However, progression is weakened by abrupt transitions and unclear links between claims. The final paragraph ends with “TO conclude,” but no conclusion follows, so the essay’s overall direction feels unfinished. Some linking is also mechanical, and the opening sentence is difficult to follow because several ideas are compressed together. Use a complete conclusion that restates your position, and make each paragraph’s main point explicit before adding examples.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “marital status,” “privacy,” “discrimination,” “company culture,” and “flexible work schedule.” These choices allow you to discuss both practical hiring considerations and possible unfair treatment. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less clear, such as “intrest,” “relevent,” “irrelevent,” and “stat uas.” Some phrases are also imprecise or unnatural, including “evaluate the applicant personality suitable for post” and “a good match for jobs like marketing.” Aim for accurate spelling and more natural collocations, and distinguish carefully between personal interests and sensitive personal details. This would make your argument clearer and more precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional example beginning “if a person does not like meeting people” and a contrast introduced by “Although.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to read. Examples include “such question are critical,” “Employer ask,” and “he would not be consider d good match,” which show problems with agreement, verb forms, and articles. Sentence boundaries and capitalization are also unreliable: “in this essay” follows a full stop without a capital, and the final “Although” clause is left incomplete. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, verb forms, articles, and complete sentence structure before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.