Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is always questionable whether employers should ask for personal information such as leisure activities or marital status in job applications or not. A school of thoughts agree that these statements have relevance and usefulness with job duties, while others strongly disagree. I believe that it may be useful in various jobs but should not be compulsory for everyone to answer these questions.

Seeking information related to personal hobbies and marital situation is beneficial for employers in various ways. Firstly, they can offer job roles to successful candidates according to their interest. For instance, extracurricular job duties can be assigned to teachers as per their hobbies which would make them to use their innate skills and help children while enjoying the activity by themselves. Secondly, getting to know if a job applicant is married or not can provide an idea about flexibility of schedule and workplace. As an example, single people can commute to remote workplaces and accept any job schedule as they are not restricted to their family roles as much as married people are.

However, there are potential reasons that are against seeking this infomation. Folks want to keep their personal and professional life apart from each other. Their choice should be respected and eventually, their personal consent should matter. Moreover, their qualification and eligibility ought to be key factors to be considered while assessing their job applications. It will provide a fair system of hiring suitable candidates.

In conclusion, I think that job seekers should have choice to make while answering their personal questions as their qualification should be outweighed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response discusses both perspectives and gives a clear personal view: personal details may help in some roles, but applicants should not be required to disclose them. The examples about assigning extracurricular duties to teachers and flexibility for remote work make the supporting view relevant. However, the second example relies on a broad assumption that single people are generally more available, and the opposing view is less developed: privacy and qualifications are mentioned, but the consequences of asking for such information are not explained in detail. The conclusion restates the position, though “qualification should be outweighed” appears to reverse the intended meaning. Develop both sides more evenly and clarify how your opinion follows from the discussion.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, one paragraph for each view, and a conclusion. The progression is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help readers identify the stages of the argument. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent arrangement and also shows some stronger control through purposeful paragraphing. To make the flow more natural and flexible, avoid relying so heavily on explicit sequencing phrases and connect ideas through clearer explanation. For example, the shift from marital status to schedule flexibility would benefit from a more careful link, since the claim about single applicants is a generalisation. The final sentence also needs a clearer connection to the stated position.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

There is an adequate range for the topic, including phrases such as “personal and professional life,” “job duties,” “innate skills,” and “eligibility.” The writer also attempts more formal vocabulary, but some choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which is consistent with this level of control. For example, “a school of thoughts” is not the natural expression, “statements have relevance and usefulness with job duties” is awkward, and “infomation” is misspelled. “Extracurricular job duties” is also unclear in context. Aim for precise, natural collocations rather than formal-sounding phrases, and proofread spelling. These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding the main argument, but they reduce fluency and precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex forms, including a conditional structure (“if a job applicant is married or not”) and a relative clause (“which would make them…”). Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors and awkward constructions persist. For example, “make them to use” should be “enable them to use” or “make them use,” while “their qualification should be outweighed” does not express the intended comparison clearly. The opening phrase “whether … or not” is also unnecessarily repetitive in this sentence. Work on verb patterns, sentence phrasing, and clear comparisons, while retaining the range of structures already attempted. More consistently accurate sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.