Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is an ongoing debate that whether asking an employee about his/her personal information, such as their hobbies or marital status during his/her interview is a relevant or an irrelevant information. I think inquiring about personal information of an employee is a pragmatic decision.

Firstly, I will discuss the opinion of those who believes otherwise. The main argument againt this act is that it is against one's right to privacy. People from this strata believes that work is something which should be absolutely seperated from personal life. Having an access to such sort of personal information might lead to exploitation of the employee by the employer. This could impact the overall well being of the employee, which in turn could open many vistas of disturbance in his/her life.

However, I believe this is a win-win scenario for all the stakeholders. It not only enables the employer to comprehend their employees better, but at the same time it act as a safety net for the employee. From the employer prespective, if he/she knows about the hobbies or a marital status of his/her employee, it will help him/her in assiging duties to the employee based on his work psyhcee. A person who is married usually display a more responsible attitude in his/her conduct compared to an unmarried individual. On the other hand, having familarity with such information cause an employer to be more cautious in terms of his/her decision for his/her employee. An employer will think twice before firing an employee who is married because of the number of family members who are counting on that employee.

In a nutshell, having access to the personal information of the employee is not a bad thing. The issues regarding privacy and mental well-being are not baseless but they can be mitigated with proper measures. However, if we look at the broader picture asking such questions is benefical for both parties.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—privacy concerns versus employer benefits—and clearly states the writer's own opinion in the introduction and conclusion. Ideas are extended and supported, such as when the student explains how knowing marital status helps assign duties or acts as a safety net during employment decisions. However, some arguments border on broad generalisations, such as the claim that married individuals uniformly display a more responsible attitude. Overall, the prompt is well-addressed with a clear position throughout, aligning closely with Band 7 descriptors.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay displays a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct focus: introduction, opposing view, supporting view, and conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'However', 'On the other hand', and 'In a nutshell' are used to structure the text, although some transitions feel slightly mechanical. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas. Referencing is generally clear, though minor improvements in lexical chaining would elevate the coherence. These features place the response solidly at Band 7.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student demonstrates a sufficient range of vocabulary for the task, allowing for some flexibility and precision with terms like 'pragmatic decision', 'exploitation', and 'mitigated'. There are, however, several lexical errors, spelling mistakes, and awkward collocations throughout the text, such as 'againt' instead of 'against', 'prespective' instead of 'perspective', 'assiging', 'familarity', and 'work psyhcee'. Less common items are attempted with mixed success, meaning the overall lexical profile fits the Band 6 descriptor well.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating a willingness to experiment with subordination and relative clauses. There are, nevertheless, frequent grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('those who believes', 'it act', 'cause an employer to be'), redundant phrasing ('an irrelevant information'), and article misuse ('a marital status'). While these errors do not impede overall communication, they persist too frequently to achieve a Band 7, making Band 6 a fair and accurate assessment.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.