Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued that all the educational board believes on studying the knowledge not trying to give practical skills to student.. I completely agree with this view because student need to develop the skills practically because it enhance the student abilities of understanding.

The primary reason why I agree with this statement is because many of the educational board not providing the students to develop the skills or method practically which can cause student disability of doing work in the future. For example, if the student only learn about how to use the computer but not did it practically so when they sit first time on a computer they did not know how to use the computer in the real manners. Another main reason is that the government is not giving the budget to federal institutes or private institutes is not providing the practical labs for doing work practically.

Furthermore, the institutes is not providing the extra class for practical to teachers so the lecturer have to manage their class according to the given time. For example, the institutes of Pakistan only gave 30 to 45 minutes for one class and the teacher have to manage their time so they did not have much time to go for practical class. In addition, institutes only purpose is that students clear the exams, they didn't care about the students that they develop the skills or not .The institutes just want money and not developing the student for future difficulties waiting for them.

In conclusion, I completely agree with view about institutes are not interested in developing practical skills in student because institutes have no restriction in many countries. The institutes is taking money from students and giving nothing to them.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you state that you completely agree and maintain this view in the conclusion. You also give relevant examples, including computer learning without hands-on practice and limited class time in Pakistani institutes. However, the response only partly develops the issue. It focuses mainly on shortcomings in institutions and funding, rather than explaining more fully why education gives too much attention to facts or how practical skills could be incorporated at different levels, from primary school to university. The claim that institutes “just want money” is broad and is not supported with evidence. To strengthen the response, explain the consequences of fact-based learning and develop a specific example showing how practical teaching would improve students’ abilities.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposts such as “The primary reason,” “Furthermore” and “In addition” help show the intended sequence. However, progression within the paragraphs is not always clear: the discussion moves from practical computer use to government budgets, then to class time and institutional motives without consistently explaining how each point connects to the main argument. Repeated references to “institutes” and “practical” also make the links feel mechanical. Some sentences run together, particularly around “not .The institutes,” which interrupts the flow. Group related points together and use clearer references and transitions to show how each example supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the general argument, including “practical skills,” “educational board,” “federal institutes” and “practical labs.” However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, especially “institutes,” “practically” and “student.” Some collocations and word choices are unclear or unnatural, such as “student disability of doing work” and “real manners,” which make the intended meaning harder to follow. “The institutes just want money” is also an imprecise, sweeping expression for an academic essay. Build a more varied vocabulary for teaching methods, hands-on learning and student outcomes, and check that phrases sound natural in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including explanations introduced by “because” and examples beginning with “if.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to read. For example, “all the educational board believes” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “if the student only learn … but not did it” contains errors in verb form and tense. Agreement problems also appear in “the institutes is not providing” and “the lecturer have to manage.” Sentence boundaries and punctuation need attention too, as in “not .The institutes.” Practise accurate present-tense agreement and past-tense forms, and divide long sentences into clear clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.