Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is observed that teaching methods emphasize more on theoretical past rather than focusing on in hand skills. However, few individuals believe that education at all levels should be taught in a practical manner despite on learning facts. Therefore, I agree with the statement given as people learn more when they practically practice the theories instead of rote learning the fact.

Practical skills are often seen has inappropriate by the higher learning authorities, however, it provides children a direct way to learn the theory without confusing it with the statements. For example, physics is a subject which involves practical learning therefore, performing practical may increase their chances of grasping the topic clearly rather than cramming the facts.

Moreover, it is widely seen that many professions includes practical skills. For example, professional doctors learn and perform the surgeries on the cadavers. Hence, practical study is crucial in terms of getting qualified and trained doctors.

Primary school children are seen as more adaptive towards practical learning. For example, using tools and toys to improve cognitive learning of the kids. Therefore, it is pivotal to introduce more practical work in the junior section as kids at the age of 3-5 are active learners and hence, they will learn things quickly by performing the tasks rather then writing or reading the books.

On the other hand, theoretical study is an integral part of education system. Typically, lawyers require both the aspects equally as they have to learn the whole constitution along with practicing session at a college or university courts.

To sum up, the time spent on both the factors should be partially divided. Although, some professionals require more skill training then theory. There should be proper rules and regulations to undertake proper management.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

You have addressed the prompt by taking a clear position and providing relevant examples for both sides of the argument. Your ideas are generally well-supported, such as the mention of medical training and primary education. However, the development of your ideas is somewhat limited; for instance, the paragraph on primary school children could be more deeply connected to the broader argument about 'facts versus skills'. While you cover all parts of the task, the conclusion is slightly underdeveloped and could have better synthesised your main points to provide a more comprehensive final stance. Overall, the response is relevant and clearly focused on the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is logically organised with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. You use cohesive devices such as 'Moreover', 'For example', and 'On the other hand' to guide the reader through your argument. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical, and there are instances where the flow between sentences could be smoother. For example, the transition between the discussion of medical training and primary school education is a bit abrupt. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas, which helps the overall readability of the response.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'cognitive learning', 'pivotal', and 'theoretical study'. However, there are some inaccuracies in word choice and collocation that slightly hinder precision. For example, you use 'theoretical past' instead of 'theoretical knowledge' and 'in hand skills' instead of 'practical skills'. Additionally, phrases like 'cramming the facts' are slightly informal for an academic essay. While your vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning clearly, it lacks the flexibility and sophistication required for a higher band score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally distract the reader. Examples include 'many professions includes' (subject-verb agreement), 'seen has inappropriate' (should be 'as'), and 'rather then' (should be 'than'). While these errors do not impede communication, they are persistent throughout the text. Your control over punctuation and sentence structure is generally functional, but more attention to detail regarding verb forms and prepositions would improve the accuracy of your writing significantly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.