Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 11 · 2026-08-23

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the contemporary world, it has been a common debate among young generation that an educational institute mainly focus on theoratical knowledge rather than practical skills. I am completly disagree with this opinion and support that theoretical data strengthen the foundation of learning and develop cognitive ability, imagination power.

There are several benefits which can serve by learning facts about education to childrens. The people who support practical skill should be thought in the learning centers. However that can only work if toddlers are ausare of fundamental of particular subject. If they are clear about how and when to apply, then it will clear their doubts about implication. For instance, if english and meaning

will be thought to childrens, they can not use appropriate language, untill and unless they clear about the usage and meaning of alphabets before speaking. Consequently learning basics can be aciquire by theoratical information.

In the same time, in the universities there are different feild of study which alway can be choesem by individual for future profession. The theoratical data helps youngster to create their imagination power and durectly impact their cognitive ability. Moreover when dweller collect information from books, it stay with them for lenger period in the mind. When they thinking about aspect of the subject that data arrange itself in the mind create ellision and artifical animations. This assist individual to imagine about learning. For example for becoming doctor, it is essiential for individual to learn all theoratical information before proceeding implement in practical. In the practical when they are doing particular treatment then fact and instruction orignly playback in their mind in a form of imagination. Hence theoratical data in the learning centre play vital scale to form individual thinking and imagination.

In conclusion, although practical implication are essential in individuals life, learning fact serves as a fundamental foundation of basic and as forster the imagination powers of young generation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The essay addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout, arguing in favor of theoretical knowledge. However, the development of ideas is somewhat hampered by unclear expression. For instance, the explanation of how theoretical data creates 'artificial animations' is abstract and difficult to follow, which limits the depth of the argument. While the example of medical training is relevant, the connection between theory and practical application could be more explicitly articulated to fully satisfy the requirements of the task. The response is generally relevant, but the lack of clarity in supporting arguments prevents it from reaching a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a central theme. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate. Phrases like 'In the same time' and 'consequently learning basics can be aciquire' (sic) disrupt the flow. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the transition between the discussion of children and university students. While there is an overall progression, the lack of sophisticated linking words and the presence of awkward phrasing mean that the cohesion is not always smooth or effective.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there are numerous spelling errors (e.g., 'theoratical', 'completly', 'ausare', 'aciquire', 'feild', 'choesem', 'durectly', 'essiential') and word choice inaccuracies (e.g., 'vital scale', 'durectly impact', 'playback'). These errors are frequent and occasionally force the reader to pause to interpret the intended meaning. While the student attempts to use more academic vocabulary, the lack of precision and the high frequency of spelling mistakes significantly limit the score in this criterion.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('educational institute mainly focus'), incorrect verb forms ('should be thought' instead of 'taught'), and awkward sentence construction ('I am completly disagree'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While the meaning is generally conveyed, the high density of errors in basic grammar and sentence structure prevents the writing from reaching a higher level of accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.