Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Nowadays, there has been a discussion about people visiting tourist spots that have harsher condition such as the Sahara dessert or the Antartic. In my essay I will write the benefits and disadvantages of tourist who visit this kind of places.
First of all, for some people visiting dangerous places like the Antartic and the Sahara dessert are known to individual who loves excitement and adventure, because going in such places helps them clinch into that earger of being in a dangerous situation. For instance, this kind of situation gives excitement and boost some of their adrenaline and for some helps them in relieving stress. While there are different kind of people, to others going to these harsh places are merely to experience the area like any normal tourist and have knowledge of the history of the place and how people live in that kind of environtment,knowing there are dangerous species living alongside them. In addition, by visiting this place also encourage other tourist to come this way it will help the community to develop their job vailability and improve trainings for tourist guides to support future tourism in the country.
On the otherhand,visiting this places can also risk an individual own life,because in this harsh environment there are different kind of weather unlike any other states and also the species there are some very venomous and deadly that could harm the tourist if not properly handled. For example, snakes and scorpion in Sahara dessert are very venomous the tourist guide must have atleast bring an antidote for their entire tour.
In my opinion, visiting this kind of places like the Sahara dessert and the Antartic have benefits and disadvantages ,for me if someone is planning to go this place that I mention must have a proper knowledge and education of that area so they will not endager their own life and companion.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both sides of the question and give a relevant overall view: remote destinations can offer adventure, learning about local life, and employment, but also expose visitors to dangerous weather and wildlife. The examples of snakes and scorpions make the risks concrete. However, the benefits are not developed equally: the claim that tourism creates jobs and improves guide training is introduced but not explained with a specific example or clear link to the community. The conclusion gives sensible advice about preparation, though it focuses more on safety than on weighing the benefits against the disadvantages. Develop each main point with a fuller explanation or example to make the response more complete.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, a paragraph on benefits, a paragraph on disadvantages, and a concluding opinion. Sequencing phrases such as “First of all,” “In addition,” and “On the other hand” help readers follow the main stages. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “While there are different kind of people, to others…” does not clearly show how the contrast relates to the previous point, and the long benefits paragraph moves from adventure to learning and then employment without enough separation. Use clearer topic sentences and divide distinct benefits into a more logical progression. Check punctuation around linking phrases so the transitions read smoothly.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “harsh environment,” “adventure,” “venomous,” “adrenaline,” and “tourist guides.” These choices show an attempt to go beyond basic language, and the main meaning is generally understandable. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable, including “dessert” for “desert,” “Antartic” for “Antarctic,” “eager” in “clinch into that eager,” and “job vailability.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “come this way” and “experience the area like any normal tourist.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and proofread spelling. More precise terms such as “remote destinations,” “local employment,” and “extreme conditions” would strengthen the discussion.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a reason clause with “because” and a conditional idea in the conclusion. The overall meaning can usually be followed, but some grammatical errors occur in agreement, articles, plurals, and sentence construction. For example, “visiting … are known to individual” has a mismatch between the subject and verb, while “this place also encourage” needs agreement between the subject and verb. In “the tourist guide must have atleast bring an antidote,” the verb pattern is not grammatical. Several sentences are also joined with commas where a full stop or clearer clause structure is needed. Practise checking subject–verb agreement and verb forms, and break long sentences into controlled clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.