Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.

What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, the harsh weather tourist locations including the Sahara desert or The Antartica have become the most attractive spots to people. I will discuss the both pros and cons of this situation in upcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, the most beneficial point for the visitors is that they come to know about totally different side of nature. Visitors can actually feel and learn the geographical conditions of the place. By looking at the local people of such destinations, humans learn to adapt their body to various temperatures. Being in such place will teach humans how to survive in harsh conditions. A study suggest that people who wander all around the world are more capable of living a longer life.

On the other hand, the biggest drawback of travelling to very cold or hot destination can lead to life loss. Some of the parts don't even have any residency available. It becomes biggest challenge for the travellers to find a safe place to spend a day or night. Alongside, the extremely bad climate can vanish the essential resource require to support life. For example, recently a drought happened in a Desert . Population had to survive without liquids and food for weeks. Such situations can cause highly bad impact on the visitors.

In conclusion, exploring extremely cold or dry locations can provide insights of the new locations, local people daily life , and can prepare travellers to endure the difficulties regrading weather. Whereas, sometimes such places can become a threat to the life of tourists by not supplying daily necessities.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both the benefits and disadvantages of visiting extreme locations. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. For instance, the point about 'learning to adapt their body' is a bit vague and lacks a clear connection to the tourist experience. The example provided regarding a drought in a desert is slightly disconnected from the context of tourism, as it focuses on a general population crisis rather than the specific risks faced by travelers. To improve, ensure that each point is fully explained with clear, logical links to the prompt's focus on tourism.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. There is a logical progression from the introduction to the benefits, then the drawbacks, and finally the conclusion. However, the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly unnatural, such as 'To commence with' and 'Alongside'. Additionally, some referencing is a bit unclear, such as 'Some of the parts' which lacks a specific antecedent. Improving the variety and flow of linking words would help the essay move more smoothly between ideas.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but it lacks the precision and range required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward phrasing or incorrect word choices, such as 'life loss' instead of 'loss of life', 'vanish the essential resource' instead of 'deplete essential resources', and 'highly bad impact' which is quite informal. While the meaning is clear, the range of vocabulary is somewhat limited and repetitive, relying on basic descriptors rather than more sophisticated or academic terminology.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Examples include 'I will discuss the both pros and cons', 'A study suggest', 'Some of the parts don't even have any residency', and 'resource require' instead of 'resources required'. These errors are noticeable and occasionally distract the reader, though they do not prevent the overall message from being understood. To reach a higher band, focus on subject-verb agreement, article usage, and ensuring that complex sentences are constructed accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.