Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.

What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Travelling to the remote area which presents harsh condition such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic has recently surged. This trend bring several benefits, although risk associated with could not be ignored. In this essay, we will discuss both aspects.

To commence with benefits, as technology surged over the last decade, it made tourism to reach all time high. It brought several economical benefits as tourists generally record their journey and showcase it on platforms such as Youtube. Obstacles faced on these journies motivated several people globally to plan similar trips. Furthermore, these travel plans benefited local people who got boost in their businesses. African nations which recently became the hot spot for tourists to showcase the survival skills in difficult environment benefitted everyone involved.

On the other hand, these adventures could also take deadly turn. Despite advancements in connectivity all over the world, dead zones where signals are unable to reach to device still exists. Any wrong outcome in these zones could turn please journey into harsh survival situation where help is not immediately available. Exploring areas such as the Antarctic is still recognized as one of the most difficult. Harsh weather could keep someone stuck at the land of Sahara desert and the Antarctic with limited supply of food resources.

To conclude, tourism to the harsh remote area need proper planned layout or the situation could turn quickly into the deadly encounter. With proper training for survival I believe these difficult situtation in the remote area could be tackled much better.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing both the benefits and disadvantages of visiting remote, harsh locations like the Sahara desert and the Antarctic. The position is clear throughout, and the ideas are extended and supported, such as mentioning the economic boost for local businesses and the dangers of dead zones where communication fails. However, some arguments lack deeper elaboration or specific real-world examples, tending slightly toward generalisations. For instance, the reference to African nations showcasing survival skills could have been more focused. Overall, the task is well addressed, earning a solid Band 6.5.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The response exhibits a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, dividing the introduction, benefits, disadvantages, and conclusion appropriately. Logical progression is generally maintained using transition markers such as 'To commence with benefits' and 'On the other hand'. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical. For example, referencing can be unclear, such as 'This trend bring several benefits, although risk associated with could not be ignored.' Paragraph transitions feel a bit rigid, and occasional awkward phrasing impacts the overall flow. These characteristics align closely with the Band 6 descriptor.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items such as 'surged', 'economical benefits', and 'survival situation'. However, there are noticeable inaccuracies in word choice, collocation, and form, such as writing 'economical benefits' instead of 'economic benefits', 'dead zones where signals are unable to reach to device' instead of 'to devices', and 'please journey' instead of 'pleasant journey'. While these errors do not impede communication, they restrict the lexical score to Band 6.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over structure. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement and article usage, such as 'This trend bring' instead of 'brings', 'harsh condition' instead of 'harsh conditions', and 'tourism to the harsh remote area need proper planned layout' instead of 'needs a properly planned layout'. Punctuation and word form errors persist throughout the text. Although these errors rarely impede communication, they prevent the text from reaching a higher band, placing it firmly at Band 5.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.