Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.

What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the recent years, it is witnessed that myraid of people are exploring the place where conditions are not good. In my perspective it have both favourable and unfavourable outcomes those I will explain in the upcoming paragraphs.

As far as the positive side of this trend are concern, the predominent one is that large number of tourists on place where conditions are bad can greatly contribute to increase revenue for that place that ultimately help to ecomonic upliftment. Another noteworthy point of consideration is that tourist started to buy the local goods of that particualar place resulting to give benefit to local manufecture. Furthermore, many people donot know about such place like Sahara so visiting larrge number of people can benefit to another audiance to get familiar about there conditions , local goods and their traditions. Lastly, local people can get advice from the tourist as how they can improve their area so that they can attract the more people towards themselves.

On the other hand, the negative side of exploring the bad condition place cannot be uderestimated as going to the geographicaly bad place such as Antarctic can create my serious accident for people because they donot know about it and they have to face many challenging situation in there life. on top of it, some these places have not good condition to alive and food for people so they cannot survive there. last but not least, they donot need to spend large amount of money to exploring these place rather than they should save it for there future.

To recapitulate, i would reckon that tourist should get sagaious advice towards exploring the distinct places by keeing its desirable and undesirable outcomes in to considerations in order to gain holistic growth with resplendent walk of life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question by presenting benefits and disadvantages, and your position is clear: you see the trend as having both favourable and unfavourable effects. Relevant benefits include increased revenue, sales of local goods, and greater awareness of remote places; risks include accidents, difficult living conditions, and expense. However, several points are asserted rather than explained. For example, the suggestion that tourists can advise residents on improving an area is not supported with an example, and the financial disadvantage is framed mainly as tourists choosing to save money rather than as a specific consequence of visiting these destinations. Develop each main point with a clear explanation or example to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for benefits and disadvantages, and a conclusion. This makes the main direction easy to follow, and signposts such as “On the other hand” help distinguish the two sides. The sequence within the benefits paragraph is also generally understandable. To strengthen progression further, group related ideas and make the links between them more explicit; for instance, explain how spending on local goods leads to wider economic benefits. Some transitions, including “Lastly” and “last but not least,” feel mechanical, while the conclusion introduces broad wording about “holistic growth” rather than directly summarising the arguments. Clearer referencing and a more focused final summary would improve cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “revenue,” “local goods,” “challenging situation,” and “traditions.” These choices show an effort to discuss economic, cultural, and safety effects. However, inaccurate word choice, spelling, and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning difficult to interpret. Examples include “myraid,” “predominent,” “ecomonic upliftment,” “local manufecture,” and “sagaious advice.” Some phrases are also unnatural, such as “bad condition place” and “walk of life.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than using elaborate expressions whose meaning is unclear. Proofreading spelling and choosing straightforward topic-specific vocabulary will make your ideas more precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple statements and attempts at longer, more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “as far as” and “because.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the overall meaning can usually be followed. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries recur. For example, “the positive side … are concern” has faulty agreement and form, while “it have both” should use a singular verb. The sentence beginning “On top of it” also runs into several clauses without clear punctuation, and “they cannot survive there” has an unclear reference. Practise building accurate complex sentences and check subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation before submitting.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.