Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children's sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.

Write a letter to the company. In your letter

• describe the benefits of sponsoring the sports team
• summarise the benefits of paying for the concerts
• say how you think the company should spend the money

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Student answer (Band 6.5)

Dear Sir,

I am writing to express my opinion regarding your company's decision to spend money on sponsoring local children's sports or investing in open-air concerts.

I would like to describe some merits of sponsoring sports teams. First and foremost, it would encourage children to spend quality time doing physical activities, which helps them to develop skills. Moreover, children also feel more energetic and reduce the use of mobile phones to play indoor activities such as video games and computer games.

On the other hand, there are several advantages of paying for concerts, such as ordinary people becoming more joyful and living their lives with cheerfulness and entertainment. A considerable number of people come to enjoy a concert and spend their time without worries. It strengthens the bond between people, which is highly beneficial for society members to reduce conflict with each other.

From my perspective, I would recommend that the company spend the money on sponsoring the sports team, which benefits pupils and also the community members.

I would be grateful if you would consider my viewpoints.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Your Faithfully,

Simrsnpreet

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You address all three points and maintain a clear recommendation: the company should sponsor the children’s team. The sports benefits include encouraging physical activity and helping children develop skills, while the concert section explains enjoyment and stronger community bonds. These are relevant and supported with some explanation, which gives the letter a clear purpose. However, several claims remain broad—for example, that concerts help people “reduce conflict” and that sponsorship benefits “the community members”—without explaining how these outcomes would occur. The comparison would be more persuasive if you developed one or two specific benefits for each option and linked them more directly to the company’s local impact. The recommendation is clear, though its justification could draw more explicitly on the benefits discussed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The letter has a clear progression: an opening stating its purpose, a paragraph on sports sponsorship, a contrasting paragraph on concerts, and a final recommendation. Transitions such as “First and foremost,” “Moreover,” and “On the other hand” help readers follow the comparison, and the closing is appropriately separated. This logical organisation is effective. Some linking is a little formulaic, however, and the relationship between ideas is occasionally loose: the point about children reducing mobile-phone use is added to the sports paragraph without a clear explanation of its connection to the main benefit. The final recommendation also repeats the earlier claim that sponsorship benefits pupils and the community rather than synthesising the comparison. More varied transitions and clearer links between supporting points would make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range for the topic, including “sponsoring,” “physical activities,” “considerable number,” and “strengthens the bond.” These choices communicate the main ideas, and the meaning remains clear. There are, however, some imprecise or unnatural expressions that limit flexibility and collocational control. “Investing in open-air concerts” is less direct than the task’s idea of paying for them, while “ordinary people becoming more joyful” and “spend their time without worries” sound awkward in this context. “Reduce the use of mobile phones to play indoor activities” also combines ideas unclearly. Aim for natural, precise phrases such as “give children opportunities to be physically active” and “bring local residents together.” Check word forms and collocations when revising.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including relative clauses in “physical activities, which helps them…” and “the bond between people, which is highly beneficial…”. Most sentences are understandable, and punctuation generally supports the meaning. Some grammatical errors remain, but they rarely prevent communication. For example, “which helps them” does not agree with the plural idea “physical activities”; “children also feel more energetic and reduce the use” has an unclear subject relationship; and “recommend that the company spend” is correct, but the surrounding sentence could be structured more clearly. The closing “Your Faithfully” also needs correction as a conventional letter sign-off, though this is primarily a form issue. Review subject–verb agreement and make sure each clause has a clear subject and logical connection.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.