Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-09-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children's sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.

Write a letter to the company. In your letter

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Student answer (Band 7.5)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am writing in response for your invitation for public comment on how your company's donation to the local community should be spent.

In my view, sponsoring the children's sport team would bring the greater benefit. Many families in this area cannot afford proper kit, qualified coaching or transport to away matches, and a two-year commitment would allow the club to plan ahead instead of struggling from one season to the next. Regular sports also keeps young people fit and teaches them discipline and teamwork at precisely the age when such habits are formed.

The concerts, of course, have their own attractions. They would appeal for a far wider, audience, including adults and elderly residents who would gain nothing from a children's team, and an open-air event would bring the whole town together for an evening.

Nevertheless, I would strongly encourage you to support the team. A concert is over in a few hours, whereas many invested in these children will shape their health and confidence for years to come.

Yours faithfully,

Viral Siddhapura

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response8.0
Coherence and Cohesion8.0
Lexical Resource7.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy7.5
Overall7.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 8.0

The response fully addresses all parts of the prompt. You have clearly described the benefits of the sports team sponsorship, summarized the advantages of the concerts, and provided a clear, well-reasoned recommendation. The ideas are well-developed and relevant, showing a good understanding of the task requirements. The tone is appropriate for a formal letter, and the position is consistent throughout the text. There are no omissions, and the content is balanced effectively across the three required bullet points.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 8.0

The letter is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a distinct focus, moving from the introduction to the benefits of the sports team, then the concerts, and finally your recommendation. Cohesive devices such as 'In my view', 'The concerts, of course', and 'Nevertheless' are used effectively to guide the reader. The paragraphing is appropriate, and the flow between sentences is smooth, making the letter easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.0

You demonstrate a good range of vocabulary appropriate for the task. Phrases like 'two-year commitment', 'plan ahead', and 'shape their health and confidence' are used accurately. There are minor collocation issues, such as 'in response for' (should be 'in response to') and 'appeal for a far wider, audience' (the comma is unnecessary and 'appeal to' is more natural). However, these are minor and do not impede communication. The vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning with precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures effectively. Most sentences are error-free, and the control of grammar is generally strong. There are a few minor slips, such as 'Regular sports also keeps' (should be 'keep' to agree with the plural subject) and the aforementioned preposition error 'in response for'. Despite these occasional inaccuracies, the grammatical control is high, and the meaning is always clear. Punctuation is generally handled well, contributing to the overall readability of the letter.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.