Band 9.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 9.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-08-14
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 9.0)
The shift toward large regional shopping centres at the expense of independent high-street stores is a predominantly negative development. While large malls offer undeniable consumer convenience and competitive pricing, the decline of local businesses inflicts serious, long-term damage on local economies, community cohesion, and environmental sustainability.
The Advantages of Large Shopping Centres
It is important to acknowledge why consumers prefer shopping centres:
Convenience and Variety: Malls act as "one-stop shops" where consumers can buy groceries, clothing, and electronics under one roof, often with amenities like free parking and climate-controlled environments.
Economies of Scale: Large retailers and supermarket chains can leverage buying power to offer lower prices and broader product ranges, helping families stretch their household budgets.
Why the Overall Trend is Negative
Despite these individual benefits, the systemic impact on local communities is detrimental.
1. Economic Vulnerability and Wealth Drain
When customers shop at multinational chains in large malls, a significant portion of profits leaves the local community to satisfy corporate shareholders. Conversely, independent local shops reinvest revenue locally—by sourcing from regional suppliers, hiring local professionals, and paying local rates. When local businesses close, the economic multiplier effect is broken, leaving local high streets with empty storefronts and reduced municipal tax bases.
2. Erosion of Community and Cultural Identity
Local shops serve as vital social anchors. Independent bakeries, tailors, and family-owned groceries foster personal relationships and regular social contact, particularly for older residents. As town centres turn into rows of shuttered shops, communities lose their distinct character and social cohesion, replaced by identical, homogenized shopping complexes that look the same in every city.
3. Environmental and Accessibility Costs
Out-of-town shopping centres are almost universally designed around car ownership. Requiring customers to drive long distances to major retail hubs increases traffic congestion and carbon emissions. Furthermore, it marginalizes non-drivers, low-income families, and the elderly who rely on walking or local public transport to access basic goods.
Conclusion
While large shopping malls deliver convenience and short-term cost savings to individual shoppers, the broader societal impact is negative. The destruction of local high streets weakens local economies, erodes community connection, and encourages car-dependent urban planning. To maintain vibrant, resilient towns, local governments should support independent businesses through tax incentives and urban regeneration projects that encourage residents to shop locally.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 9.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 9.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 9.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 9.0 |
| Overall | 9.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 9.0
The response fully addresses all parts of the task. You have taken a clear position from the introduction and maintained it throughout the essay. The ideas are well-developed, with distinct arguments regarding economic, social, and environmental impacts. Each point is supported by relevant examples, such as the mention of 'independent bakeries' and 'carbon emissions,' which adds depth to your analysis. The structure is logical, and the conclusion effectively synthesizes your arguments. You have successfully balanced the acknowledgement of opposing views with a strong, well-reasoned argument for your own position, meeting the criteria for a high band score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 9.0
The essay is exceptionally well-organized. Each paragraph has a clear central theme, and the progression of ideas is logical and easy to follow. You use cohesive devices such as 'Conversely,' 'Despite these individual benefits,' and 'Furthermore' effectively to link sentences and paragraphs. The use of headings is a stylistic choice that, while not strictly necessary for an IELTS essay, does not detract from the flow or the clarity of the argument. Paragraphing is used skillfully to separate distinct points, and referencing is precise throughout the text.
Lexical Resource — Band 9.0
You demonstrate a wide and sophisticated range of vocabulary. Phrases such as 'economic multiplier effect,' 'homogenized shopping complexes,' and 'urban regeneration' show a high level of lexical control and precision. The vocabulary is not only accurate but also contextually appropriate, contributing to a natural and professional tone. There are no noticeable errors in word choice or collocation, and the use of less common items is handled with ease. This level of vocabulary usage is indicative of a high-level proficiency.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 9.0
The grammatical range is excellent, featuring a variety of complex sentence structures, such as conditional clauses and participial phrases (e.g., 'Requiring customers to drive...'). The majority of sentences are error-free, and the punctuation is used accurately to enhance clarity. You demonstrate a high level of control over complex structures, and there are no significant grammatical slips that impede communication. The writing is fluent, precise, and demonstrates a sophisticated command of English grammar suitable for a high band score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.