Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.

What is your opinion about this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued by segment of society that to built strong economy we should use countryside space. While, other believe this space should be protect for farming and natural habitats.

To begin with, number of urben cities are now facing challenges such as over croweded. to solve this problem people suggest concreat homes outside of cities will help also it will boost the economy. But this steps will start diminise major agriculture land which is play vital role in economy. Domestic farmer loose there farming land. Further more it will rapidly destripute food chain as this concequence people will rely on internation food and national food will loose there identity.Governement will depand on exporting food it means basic nned prices will srart rising it will slowly collespe economy.

Furthermore, there are number of green space which spece for animales it will start to destroy there land. forest spae will minimize and it will rapidly increase pollution and cause earth negetively. Rather than moving out coutryside they can built high vertical housing modes, such as building tower which is curently most of coutries accepting this stpes will save the crucial land and natural habitats. As well as it will fulfil the accomdation demand.

In conclusion, i think protecting countryside land from become real state building will stops vivid paramount of crisic specially envirornment and economy. it will brings drawbacks for national animals and food chain. There are a few solutions now introduce like high destiny urben planning will sorted out this imporatant problem.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position on building on the countryside versus protecting it, and it outlines relevant ideas such as economic benefits, agricultural impacts, and urban housing alternatives. However, some ideas are under-developed or remain somewhat generalized. For instance, the discussion regarding the disruption of the food chain and the reliance on international food is introduced but lacks full extension and specific supporting examples. The higher band attributes of fully developed ideas and well-supported arguments are partially visible in the suggestion of high vertical housing modes, but overall, the depth of task coverage keeps the response balanced between the addressed criteria.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear stance maintained throughout the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Progression is visible as the writer transitions from economic and agricultural concerns to environmental impacts and alternative solutions. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical. Linkers and referencing are occasionally awkward, such as the abrupt transitions between sentences and the repetitive use of connective elements. Paragraphing is utilized to separate main ideas, but referencing within and between sentences is not always completely clear, occasionally requiring the reader to work harder to follow the logical links between arguments.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is minimally adequate for the task, providing enough range to discuss the topic of urban expansion and countryside protection. The writer attempts some less-common vocabulary, such as 'natural habitats', 'agriculture land', and 'vertical housing', but these attempts are accompanied by noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling, such as 'urben', 'concreat', 'diminise', 'destripute', and 'collespe'. These lexical inaccuracies and spelling errors are frequent enough to cause some difficulty for the reader and restrict the score, preventing the response from reaching a higher band where a wider and more accurate range of lexical items is demonstrated.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The text displays a limited range of structures, relying on a mix of simple and attempted complex sentences. Attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty, featuring persistent errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, articles, and pluralisation, such as 'segment of society', 'to built', 'number of urben cities are', and 'Domestic farmer loose there farming land'. These frequent errors in grammar and punctuation can cause some difficulty for the reader. The writer shows some control over basic sentence construction, but the density of structural and grammatical inaccuracies prevents the attainment of a higher band descriptor.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.