Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 12 · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.

What is your opinion about this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There has been an ongoing debate regarding the development of new infrastructure in the rural area. At many locations, construction of new residential spaces is required; however, the only land left is in the suburban region. While others think that it is crucial to preserve that area instead of building new houses there. I firmly agree with the latter view. This essay will explore the valid reasons along with an appropriate example in the ensuing paragraphs.

Supporters of the former view argue that the availability and cost of land in the outskirts is cheap compared to the city area. This is due to the fact that construction of new skyscrapers would be comparatively possible at a low budget. Consequently, citizens found budget-friendly homes so they could move towards that region. Furthermore, the housing crisis is an alarming issue. This is because many individuals prefer to live in the city area for job and business opportunities. As a result, residential shortages arise. Hence, construction of a new dwelling place is required at farmland places. For instance, Mumbai and Delhi, like other metropolitan cities, are suffering from the same problem. So, the village is the best option for the development of the accommodation places.

Advocates of the latter view state that preservation of an environment is a significant effect on the world because nature provides some essential aspects to living a healthy life. For example, oxygen, fruits, and vegetables. Therefore, there is a serious threat of global warming vanishing. Moreover, the majority of food supply comes from farmlands; if they get converted into residential spaces, the food supply chain is disrupted. As a result, an edible shortage occurs. In addition to this, farmers may lose their land and their job also. Hence, the cultivator's job crisis happens as they do not have familiarity with other sorts of jobs.

In conclusion, although cheap land provides low-cost homes to the citizens. From my perspective, nature protection, major eatables lost, and feeders of the world get unemployed by urbanization in countryside spaces.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you agree that countryside should be protected, and you address both the case for building homes and the reasons to preserve rural land. The discussion of food production and farmers’ livelihoods is relevant, while the Mumbai and Delhi example helps illustrate housing pressure. This meets the task well, but the support is uneven: the benefits of building are explained in some detail, whereas the environmental argument is asserted rather than fully shown. The claim that global warming is “vanishing” is unclear, and the conclusion lists consequences without clearly restating how they support your opinion. Develop the environmental impact with a specific cause-and-effect explanation and make the example more directly support your position.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for opposing views, and a conclusion. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “As a result,” and “In addition to this” help signal relationships between points. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical, and some links do not express a clear logical connection: “Therefore” before the statement about global warming is difficult to follow. The opening of the second paragraph, “While others think…,” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence, which interrupts the progression. The conclusion also shifts abruptly from the concession to a compressed list of harms. Use fewer formulaic connectors, clarify how each point follows from the previous one, and ensure each paragraph ends by reinforcing the central argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “housing crisis,” “farmlands,” “food supply chain,” and “urbanization,” and the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also noticeable inaccuracies in word choice and collocation that make some phrases awkward or unclear. For example, “the availability and cost of land…is cheap” does not express the intended idea naturally, “a serious threat of global warming vanishing” is confusing, and “major eatables” is not an appropriate phrase for food supplies. “Residential spaces” and “accommodation places” are also less natural than simpler, precise alternatives. Aim for accurate collocations rather than formal-sounding substitutions, and check whether each chosen phrase conveys the intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a conditional clause in “if they get converted into residential spaces” and a relative clause in “nature provides some essential aspects…”. Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors and sentence-boundary problems are evident. “While others think that it is crucial…” is a dependent clause presented as a sentence, and “although cheap land provides low-cost homes…” is also left incomplete in the conclusion. There are agreement and article issues in “the availability and cost…is cheap” and “preservation of an environment.” Review clause completeness, subject–verb agreement, and article use. More consistently accurate complex sentences would make the reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.