Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some areas of the US, a 'curfew' is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult.

What is your opinion about this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

A growing number of communities have introduced curfew laws that prohibit teenagers from being outdoors late at night unless accompanied by an adult. While some critics argue that such regulations infringe upon young people's freedom, I strongly believe that curfews are a practical and effective measure for safeguarding adolescents and maintaining public order.

The primary justification for imposing a curfew is the protection of teenagers from potential dangers. Late at night, the likelihood of becoming involved in criminal activities, substance abuse, or violent incidents increases significantly. Young people are generally more vulnerable to peer pressure and poor decision-making due to their limited life experience. By requiring teenagers to remain at home during late-night hours, authorities can substantially reduce their exposure to hazardous situations. For instance, several cities have reported noticeable declines in juvenile crime and late-night accidents following the implementation of curfew regulations.

Another compelling argument in favour of curfews is that they encourage greater parental responsibility and supervision. Adolescence is a critical stage of emotional and psychological development, during which parental guidance plays a pivotal role. When parents are aware of their children's whereabouts during the evening, they can provide better support, monitor their activities, and foster healthier lifestyles. Furthermore, curfews promote discipline by encouraging teenagers to establish regular sleeping patterns, which can enhance academic performance, physical health, and emotional well-being.

Admittedly, opponents contend that curfews restrict personal freedom and prevent responsible teenagers from enjoying social or recreational activities. They argue that not all adolescents engage in antisocial behaviour and that blanket restrictions may unfairly penalise law-abiding individuals. Although this concern has some merit, public safety should take precedence over unrestricted freedom for minors. Moreover, exceptions can be granted for legitimate purposes such as employment, educational activities, or emergencies, thereby ensuring that the policy remains both reasonable and flexible.

In conclusion, I firmly support the implementation of curfew laws for teenagers. Although they impose certain limitations on personal liberty, the benefits of enhancing public safety, reducing juvenile crime, and promoting responsible parenting far outweigh the disadvantages. In my opinion, well-designed curfew policies can contribute significantly to the development of safer communities while protecting young people during a vulnerable stage of their lives.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response fully addresses all parts of the prompt. You have taken a clear position from the introduction and maintained it throughout the essay. Each paragraph is well-developed with relevant supporting arguments, such as the protection of teenagers from criminal activity and the promotion of parental responsibility. The counter-argument is acknowledged and effectively refuted, demonstrating a sophisticated approach to the task. The ideas are extended logically, and the conclusion provides a strong summary of your stance. The response is well-structured and directly answers the question asked.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates a clear logical progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between paragraphs is smooth, using effective cohesive devices such as 'The primary justification', 'Another compelling argument', and 'Admittedly'. The use of referencing is precise, and the paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct points. The flow of information is natural, and the reader is guided through your argument without any confusion. The cohesive devices are used flexibly and contribute to the overall clarity of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

You have used a wide and sophisticated range of vocabulary throughout the essay. Phrases such as 'infringe upon', 'substantially reduce', 'compelling argument', and 'take precedence' demonstrate a high level of lexical control. The vocabulary is not only accurate but also appropriate for the formal tone of an IELTS essay. There are no noticeable errors in word choice or collocation, and the use of less common items is natural and precise. This level of vocabulary is consistent with a high-scoring response.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay displays a wide range of complex grammatical structures with high accuracy. You have successfully used conditional sentences, passive voice, and complex noun phrases. The majority of your sentences are error-free, and the punctuation is used correctly to enhance readability. There are no significant grammatical errors that impede communication. The control over sentence structure is consistent, and the variety of forms used—from simple to complex—is well-balanced, reflecting a high level of grammatical competence.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.