Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-09-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some areas of the US, a 'curfew' is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult.

What is your opinion about this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

There is an ongoing debate regarding a "curfew" in some parts of the United States of America where teenagers are restricted to go out doors after a specific time at night if they do not have an adult to accompany them. This type of restriction on growing individuals have both positive and negative impacts which will be discussed in detail.

On the one hand, imposing a curfew allows a safe environment as well as it monitor activities of teenagers. Majority of crimes including drug peddling, theft and other illegal activities are carried out in the dark. Many organizations involve innocent youngsters and attract them to these activities by offering a good amount of money. These activities are usually prefered in late hours of the day to avoid attention. Moreover, young adolescents must be accompanied by adults which ensure their safety and an adult supervision will help to understand the challenges that can occur due to late night activities.

On the other hand, growing children needs space and these kinds of restrictions can impact their mental health. This can result in fear and jugdement that dark is always associated with hostile environment. Many of these individuals can lose the confidence in the society and can develop a protective mechanism against the odd hours of night. For example, this can trigger a cycle of alertness which will effect their abilities to sense danger.

In my opinion, there must a proper guidance for children and youngsters about the potential disadvantages of hanging out alone at night and why such restrictions are important for age specific individuals. This can create a positive impact where teenagers will understand that imposing a curfew does not mean suffocation but it is a protective measure for better and safe future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by discussing the curfew and providing a clear personal opinion. The position is consistent throughout the essay. Ideas are relevant, such as the safety benefits regarding crime and the potential negative impact on adolescent mental health. However, some points could be more fully developed; for instance, the argument about 'protective mechanisms' is slightly vague and could benefit from a more concrete explanation. Overall, the response is well-structured and directly answers the question, meeting the requirements for a Band 7.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, two body paragraphs presenting opposing views, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'Moreover' are used effectively to guide the reader through the argument. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. While the flow is generally smooth, some transitions between sentences within paragraphs could be more sophisticated to reach a higher band. The progression of ideas is clear, and the central topic of each paragraph is well-maintained.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is sufficient to convey the intended meaning with some precision. Phrases like 'ongoing debate', 'hostile environment', and 'protective measure' show a good grasp of topic-specific language. However, there are some minor inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'prefered in late hours' (should be 'preferred during') and 'effect their abilities' (should be 'affect'). While the range is adequate for the task, it lacks the consistent flexibility and sophisticated control required for a higher band score. The errors do not impede communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('growing children needs space' instead of 'need') and incorrect word forms ('jugdement' instead of 'judgment'). Punctuation is generally functional, though there are minor slips. While the student attempts complex sentences, the frequency of these small errors prevents the writing from being considered consistently error-free. The grammar is sufficient to communicate ideas clearly, but more attention to subject-verb agreement and spelling is needed.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.