Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some areas of the US, a 'curfew' is imposed, in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult.

What is your opinion about this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

During a particular time at night,teens are not permitted to stay outdoors unless they are along with their guardian as in ceratin places of the US, a curfew is imposed.To this situation, I believe that this rule is beneficial.My opinion is elaborated in further paragraphs.

To begin with,curfews are generally enacted for the security of the individuals resding in a specific area.This means that, when youngsters are out during this time they may be liable to danger. Moreover,they are unable to tackle the situation as a result, parents should escort them.For instance, in some countries like Africa, where such circimstances arise teenagers are prohibited to go outdoors.

Furthermore, staying out of home during midnight may be even life threatening during the curfew. This is because, they may face the issue of theft mostly during that period and could deal with the situation.Additionally, rules are imposed for the betterment of citizens by the law. For example, in a case study, the Government officials

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You state a clear opinion—“I believe that this rule is beneficial”—and give relevant reasons about teenagers’ safety, including the risk of theft. However, the response addresses the task only minimally: the reasons are asserted rather than explained, and the example about “some countries like Africa” is vague and does not clearly support the point. The final example begins “For example, in a case study” but is unfinished, so it provides no evidence. The response also does not meet the required minimum of 250 words, leaving the argument substantially incomplete. To strengthen your answer, explain how a curfew could reduce specific risks, develop a concrete example, and consider a limitation or counterargument before concluding.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some basic organisation: you introduce your position, use “To begin with” and “Furthermore” to signal two supporting points, and keep the discussion broadly focused on safety. However, progression is limited because the two body paragraphs repeat similar claims without developing distinct stages of an argument. Several links are awkward or unclear, such as “This means that, when youngsters are out during this time they may be liable to danger. Moreover, they are unable to tackle the situation as a result, parents should escort them.” The final sentence stops mid-example, which disrupts the ending. Use clearer links between claim, explanation, and example, and complete each paragraph’s point before moving on.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “curfew,” “security,” “individuals,” “prohibited,” and “betterment,” so the reader can understand the general subject. However, the range is limited and several choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “liable to danger,” “staying out of home,” and “during the curfew” when referring to the time restriction. Spelling errors such as “ceratin,” “resding,” and “circimstances” are noticeable and reduce clarity. Aim for more precise, natural expressions and check spelling carefully. For example, describe teenagers as being “at risk” and refer to “being outside after the curfew begins.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional clause beginning “when youngsters are out” and an explanation introduced by “This is because.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence boundaries and punctuation sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. For example, “Moreover, they are unable to tackle the situation as a result, parents should escort them” joins clauses that need clearer separation. The opening sentence is also difficult to parse because several ideas are crowded together. Use full stops or conjunctions to separate complete thoughts, and practise building accurate sentences with subordinate clauses. Check spacing after commas and avoid placing commas where they interrupt the sentence structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.