Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-09-01

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Percentage of households with electrical appliances (1920-2019)

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The provided diagrams illustrate the comparison between the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one major nation during 1920 to 2019.

Overall, the vacuum cleaner had the remarkable proportion of electrical appliances used in households, meanwhile, number of hours per week amounted for moderate ratio.

At the first glance, the percentage of refrigerator during the 1920, expressed exceptionally low ratio, however, in the next year, its figures were noticeably climbed around 52% and it was dramatically inclined untill 2000 which was 98%. Additionally, the comparative data of washing machine and vacuum cleaner started fron fractionally same ratio, Nevertheless, in 1960, it demonstrated same ratio around 65%, afterwards, percentages of vacuum cleaner drastically increased up to 2019 where it illustrated 100%, simultaneously, proportion of washing machine fluctuated until 2019 having 72%.

Moving further, the percentile of housework like washing clothes, preparing meals cleaning accounted for 50 hours during the 1920, thereafter, hours of household work significantly declined up to 1960. After that, its ratio was remain unchanged untill 2019 which was 10 hours.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response covers the main features of the charts, including the trends for appliance ownership and the decline in housework hours. However, the analysis is somewhat superficial. For instance, the description of the refrigerator trend is confusingly phrased ('in the next year, its figures were noticeably climbed'), and the comparison between the washing machine and vacuum cleaner is slightly inaccurate regarding the data points. While the key trends are identified, the lack of precise data interpretation and the tendency to misinterpret the timeline (e.g., 'in the next year' instead of referring to decades) limits the depth of the response. To improve, ensure that the data points are accurately transcribed and that the relationship between the two charts is more clearly synthesised.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into logical paragraphs, with an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Overall', 'At the first glance', and 'Moving further', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or used incorrectly, such as 'meanwhile' in the overview, which does not effectively link the two distinct trends. Additionally, the referencing is occasionally unclear, making the flow of information feel slightly disjointed in places. Improving the variety and precision of linking words would enhance the overall coherence of the response.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks precision and sophistication. There are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'amounted for moderate ratio', 'figures were noticeably climbed', and 'fractionally same ratio'. The use of 'percentile' is also incorrect in this context, as the data refers to percentages. While the student attempts to use more academic vocabulary, the inaccuracies in word form and collocation occasionally impede the clarity of the message. A wider range of precise, topic-specific vocabulary is needed to reach a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors throughout. Issues include incorrect verb tenses ('its figures were noticeably climbed'), subject-verb agreement ('its ratio was remain unchanged'), and awkward phrasing ('untill 2000 which was 98%'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas and capitalization. While the meaning is generally clear, the frequency of these errors is noticeable and occasionally distracts the reader. Focusing on consistent verb tense usage and refining sentence construction will help improve the accuracy of the writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.