Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-02
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Percentage of households with electrical appliances (1920-2019)
Student answer (Band 4.5)
In recent years, the issue of --- has attracted considerable of public and academic attention. While some people contend that --- has a positive impact on --- other maintain that-- can affect them negatively. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own view.
On the one hand, critics of ---- frequently point out a number of causes. A major reason for that is this---,resulting on--- as well as. For example, recent research as shown that ---. Furthermore,--- . which makes approach less sustainable in long run.
On the other hand, proponents of --- emphasize a number of benifits.This is primary because ---, which tern leads to---.Consequently,--. For instance --- clearly illustrating how--- can positively influence both---- and -----.
In conclusion, after analyzing both sides of the-- issue, it can be concluded that the issue presents both challenges and apportunities.Therefore, a balanced approach is needed that acknowledge the risk while maximizing the benifits of----, particularly when it is implemented in a responsible and well-regulated manner.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 3.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0
The response is largely off-topic, as the student has written a generic essay template for an opinion-based Task 2 prompt rather than summarising and reporting the main features of the Task 1 line graphs regarding electrical appliance ownership and housework hours between 1920 and 2019. Consequently, the writing fails to address the visual data provided, omitting all specific figures, trends, and comparisons required by the prompt. This places the performance at the lowest end of the scale for task fulfilment.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response makes use of standard structural paragraphs and traditional essay signposts such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion'. However, the overall organisation is entirely misaligned with an Academic Task 1 data report. While mechanical cohesive devices are present to structure what looks like an essay, referencing remains disconnected from any visual data, and the logical progression fails to process or group statistical information effectively.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The vocabulary deployed consists almost entirely of generic, memorized template phrases such as 'attracted considerable of public and academic attention' and 'presents both challenges and apportunities'. There are also clear spelling and word-form errors like 'benifits', 'apportunities', and 'acknowledge'. While the student attempts a higher-level register, the reliance on pre-rehearsed blanks and placeholders prevents any genuine reporting of the chart's specific topic, capping the score firmly at this band.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The student demonstrates an attempt at complex sentence frames, using subordinate clauses and relative structures like 'which makes approach less sustainable' and 'after analyzing both sides of the issue'. However, these structures are frequently flawed due to missing words, incorrect preposition usage such as 'resulting on', and structural fragmentation. Simple sentences are mixed with faulty complex patterns, and errors in articles and verb forms occur consistently throughout the text.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.