Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 16 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Percentage of households with electrical appliances (1920-2019)

cambridge writing task 1

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line chart illustrates information the changes in how much time used in utilized for housework in households in pne particular country between 1920 and 2019.

Overall, it is clear that the percentages of household most waste of electrical proportion of vacuum cleaner, on the other hand the number of household in every week lower used after two decades.

To begin with, the percentage of household every indicator rise dramatically for example, firstly in 1920 the refrigetor used a huge amount of electricity and this proportion reached in 100% in 1980 ,also after that it's follow the upper trend. The vacuum cleaner also similar , it rose very surprisingly this proportion reached in 100% in 2000 whereas the wasing machine has been fluctuate in over the century.

In addition, the number of house used in every week , at the early are it was maintain the upper level but every two decades it fall down rapidly and it's going on continuously for instances in 1940 and 1960 it's just 35% and 20% .

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the broad contrast between rising appliance ownership and declining housework time, and you include some relevant figures, such as refrigerator ownership reaching 100% in 1980 and vacuum-cleaner ownership reaching 100% in 2000. However, the overview is unclear (“percentages of household most waste of electrical proportion”) and does not clearly summarise the main patterns. Some details are inaccurate or confusing: refrigerators were at only about 2% in 1920, not a “huge amount,” and the housework figures are hours, not percentages. The washing-machine trend also needs clearer reporting: it rose overall, with a dip around 1980, rather than simply fluctuating. To strengthen the response, state the key trends plainly and compare the series using accurate units and selected figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure, with an introduction, an overview and two detail paragraphs, and signposts such as “To begin with” and “In addition” show an attempt to organise information. However, progression within paragraphs is difficult to follow because several ideas are joined without clear relationships. For example, the first detail paragraph moves from refrigerator ownership to vacuum cleaners and washing machines in one long sequence, while the final paragraph’s opening does not clearly connect its point to the figures. Some linking phrases, including “for example” and “whereas,” are used awkwardly or without a clear comparison. Group the appliance trends together in a logical order, then describe housework hours, using clear references and shorter, well-connected sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt task-related vocabulary, including “percentage,” “proportion,” “trend,” and “fluctuate,” but control is limited and several choices make the meaning unclear. Phrases such as “most waste of electrical proportion,” “used a huge amount of electricity,” and “the number of house used” do not accurately describe ownership or hours of housework. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “pne,” “refrigetor,” and “wasing.” Aim for precise chart language and natural collocations: appliances are “owned by” or “present in” households, while time is “spent on housework.” Reusing a small set of accurate terms is more effective than using ambitious but unsuitable phrases.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use some simple clauses and attempt longer sentences with connectors, but complex sentences are often faulty, and errors frequently make relationships between ideas hard to understand. For example, “The line chart illustrates information the changes” lacks a grammatical link, while “the number of household in every week lower used” has an unclear subject and verb structure. Verb forms and agreement are also inconsistent, as in “it was maintain” and “it fall down.” Punctuation is unreliable, with long sentences joined by commas and spaces before punctuation. Practise building accurate subject–verb sentences first, then combine them with controlled clauses such as “while” or “whereas.” Check tense consistency and sentence boundaries during editing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.