Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It has often argued that watching movies in smart-phone is better option than enjoying it at cinema hall. I personally believe theatre offers more joy.

On the one hand, majority of people enjoy watching films on tablets as it saves a lot of money. This is say, there are multiple application who provides free streaming to the viewers with high quality. Consequently, people avoid to go out for movies. Moreover, many theatres prohibit outside food as it limits their earning source. For example, thousands of teenagers prefer to watch it on i-pads and phones as it prevent them from unnecessary spendings.

On the other hand, many individuals who love to see pictures in a cinema because it allows them to feel quite unique experience through sound systems or effects. In other words, story tells with full pack of nail-biting scenes gives immersive experience while high-quality of sound and with large screen is available. For instance, a survey conducted by the researchers suggested that action and science fiction movies gain huge popularity among society as maximum amount of people prefer to watch them in a cinema due to their high standard of sound system.

As per my opinion, multiplex is better way than watching movies at home as it gives opportunity to people can spend quality time with their loved ones. At home, there are some distraction, such as house chores, which can reduce the enjoyment of the films.

In conclusion, some people have opinion about whether movies should be seen in theatre or on laptops. While I personally think cinema centre provides a more realistic feeling to the viewers.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both sides of the argument and provides a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, such as the cost-effectiveness of home streaming versus the immersive experience of the cinema. However, some points are under-developed. For instance, the mention of 'thousands of teenagers' is a generalization that lacks specific support. The conclusion is slightly repetitive and could have better synthesized the main points. Overall, the task is addressed, but the development of arguments could be more nuanced to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, each with a distinct focus. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand,' 'On the other hand,' and 'In conclusion' are used to guide the reader. However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'This is say' and 'As per my opinion.' The referencing is occasionally unclear, and the flow between sentences within paragraphs could be smoother. Despite these minor issues, the progression of ideas is logical and easy to follow.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to express their ideas clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'immersive experience,' 'streaming,' and 'multiplex.' However, there are instances of imprecise word choice and collocation errors, such as 'unnecessary spendings' (should be 'unnecessary spending') and 'story tells with full pack' (should be 'stories told with a full range'). These errors do not impede communication but indicate a limited range of sophisticated vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles ('at cinema hall' instead of 'at a cinema hall'), subject-verb agreement ('application who provides' instead of 'applications that provide'), and verb forms ('people avoid to go' instead of 'people avoid going'). While these errors are noticeable, they rarely prevent the reader from understanding the intended meaning. To improve, the writer should focus on article usage and verb patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.