Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-08-31

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the modern world, It is very easy to make excellent our entertainment days through watching movies on electronics gadgets or with going to cinema. Some people concur that to see the film on our phones or on tablets to helpful in daily and others believe that to be more beneficial to get fun through see it in cinema. However, this essay will examine both reviews but my opinion to support with and propound that films could be seen on our personal gadgets than to go to the cinema for one.

Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of watching movies on phone or tables brings many advantages towards individuals life. The top-notch concrete reason is most influence when individual choose to see films on their tablet or phone, it directly effective to increase their productivity by not only for them to time save but also it saves money. Another rationale which is support to that they can access other works as same as when they save time and can proper utilize it for other important works which would be more make easy life. To exemplify, one of my friend who always see the films on their tablets instead of going cinema, even if a film is release in market, and save time and money both.

On the other hand, some strong believe that going to the cinema for watch a movie which would brings some breaks from their monotonous work and hectic daily schedules. Withal they also uphold that an entertainment likely seeing film by theator brings influence to our health benefits because there not need to break and makes events memorable for them. Apart from this, I would quote an instance of In my area, every weekend comes new film in the cinema, and few my college friends prefer to watch it and grab tickets in advance.

In my opinion, today, fast-paced era, individuals should be conciouse for their life style to effective wasting time which brings future with some difficulties to survive them, if they possess good alternative options for their entertainments. Therefore, in the modern era, if people see the film in their personal gadget which is more beneficial for them and they do not get the bother to booking tickets, spending on it, stand up in que etc.

In recapitulation, I reiterate in my opinion that there are innumerable strong aspects supporting for use of personal gadgets to watching films than go to the cinema. However, It's contrary can be overlooked or controlled.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal position. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited by the lack of clarity in the arguments. For instance, the claim that watching films on tablets increases productivity is not fully explained or logically connected to the context of entertainment. While the prompt is addressed, the supporting examples, such as the mention of a friend or college peers, are superficial and lack the depth required for a higher band. The essay maintains a consistent position throughout, but the reasoning remains repetitive and lacks sophistication.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or inaccurate, such as 'Withal' and 'In recapitulation'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences is frequently interrupted by awkward phrasing. While there is an attempt at logical progression, the connections between ideas are often weak, making the overall argument feel disjointed. The transition between the two viewpoints and the personal opinion is present but lacks the smooth integration expected at higher levels.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited and often used incorrectly, which occasionally impedes communication. There are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'make excellent our entertainment days', 'get fun', and 'theator'. The student attempts to use more complex vocabulary, but these attempts often result in unnatural phrasing. The range is sufficient to discuss the topic, but the lack of precision and the repetitive use of basic terms prevent a higher score. Spelling errors, such as 'conciouse' and 'que', also detract from the overall quality.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but the accuracy is poor. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ('one of my friend who always see'), incorrect verb forms ('going to the cinema for watch'), and missing articles. Many sentences are structurally awkward, making them difficult to parse. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar and sentence construction significantly impacts the readability of the essay.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.