Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 13 · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organised and in the correct place.

What is your opinion about this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Vivid exploration of the topic leads us towards implanted ideas within the confines of their own construction. It's significance has unavoidably been determined by present and prior social circumstances. The subject is a conceptual whole of thought. However, the detailed explication of the said topic will make a one drive conclusive approach regarding given subject. I entirely acknowlege that it's very significant to keep home and workplace tidy. Obviously, where we live everything should be neat and clean. It has numerous advantages. For instance, as far as i can see we can escape from diseases due to the fact that rubbish produce germs that harmful for our body. Additionally, we feel relax in tidy ambiance. Anytime guest can come and through clean environment we can illustrate a incredible gesture.

Even when animals sit they prefer clean place.

In the final analysis, the transmitted thoughts are worthy enough to make reasonable ground in our objective approach pertaining to the topic. However, as per my comeliness of conclusive exactitude, i would like to assert that my own example 1 years ago my friend had come to my home. At that specific time my house was totally dirty due to fact that my parents was out of city. Therefore, i cannot clean my home, weather was also rainy and stormy. So, my friend say your home is very bad. 1 week ago, again my friend come and my whole house was entirely fine he appreciate and said i am very much surprised as compared to last time. He was very pleased and said i would definitely come.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the task only partially, presenting a position that is somewhat obscured by heavily convoluted and irrelevant introductory and concluding remarks. While the writer manages to express an opinion that keeping a home and workplace tidy is significant, the main body ideas remain limited and under-developed. For instance, the arguments regarding escaping diseases due to rubbish producing germs and illustrating an incredible gesture to guests are stated briefly without sufficient extension or support. Similarly, the personal anecdote provided about a friend visiting one year ago versus one week ago is recounted with minimal analytical connection to the broader prompt. To move to a higher band, the writer needs to ensure all parts of the prompt are fully addressed with well-developed ideas, clearer positioning, and more substantive supporting examples rather than relying on brief assertions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

Information and ideas are not arranged coherently, lacking a clear overall progression. The response suffers from poor paragraphing and abrupt transitions, making the logical development difficult to follow. Although some basic cohesive devices are present, such as 'Additionally', 'For instance', and 'In the final analysis', their usage is often mechanical or awkwardly integrated, failing to establish clear relationships between sentences. Referencing is also problematic, as seen in vague transitional phrases and disjointed shifts from general arguments to personal narratives. Furthermore, the introductory and concluding paragraphs contain overly dense, philosophical-sounding boilerplate language that disrupts the flow of the text. To improve cohesion, the writer should adopt a standard essay structure with distinct paragraphs for introduction, clear body points with logical progression, and a focused conclusion, ensuring that every sentence connects naturally to the next.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary range is limited and minimally adequate for the task, with noticeable errors that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, particularly in the overly complex introduction with terms like 'explication' and 'conclusive approach', but these are often used unnaturally or inappropriately. Throughout the body paragraphs, there are frequent word-choice and collocation errors, such as 'we feel relax' instead of 'relaxed', 'tidy ambiance', and 'comeliness of conclusive exactitude'. Spelling and word form inaccuracies also occur, including 'acknowlege' and 'weather was also rainy'. To achieve a higher band, the writer must expand their vocabulary range while focusing on precise word choices, correct word forms, and natural collocations, avoiding over-complicated expressions that obscure meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentences alongside faulty attempts at complex ones. Frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and agreement can cause difficulty for the reader. Noticeable mistakes include subject-verb agreement issues such as 'rubbish produce germs that harmful' and 'my parents was out of city', incorrect verb tenses like 'i cannot clean my home' in reference to a past event, and run-on sentences lacking appropriate punctuation. Articles and prepositions are also frequently misused or omitted. To progress to a higher band, the writer needs to demonstrate a greater variety of complex sentence forms with improved control, ensuring that basic rules of tense consistency, plurals, and subject-verb agreement are applied accurately across the text.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.